It is noted correctly that findings are mixed but that some patterns have been observed over time in certain populations of children. Based on the case information provided. In your opinion Do you believe this research should be taken into account when determining whether statutes violate the First Amendment or not?

Case Information:

The United States Supreme Court found in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 768(2011), that a California statute banning the selling or renting of violent video games to minors violated the First Amendment. The statute also expanded the definition of obscenity, which had formerly only applied to unwanted content, violent materials. The state of California, on the other hand, has enacted a state law prohibiting the selling of such games that allow players to murder, aim, or sexually harass minors. The purpose of this law is to uphold the community's current expectations. A fine of up to $1,000 will be imposed for breaking this law.

The evidence on the connection between gaming and aggressive behavior has been mixed, although a recent international analysis indicates that violent video games may have an impact on certain children's behavior over time (Health, 2021). Experimental research has been identified linking violent video games to more aggressive behavior, especially in children who are at more vulnerable levels of socialization. In the case of child-initiated cyber abuse, these effects have been shown to be especially strong.

Health, C. (2021). Do video games cause aggressive behavior? - children's health. Retrieved March 09, 2021, fromhttps://www.childrens.com/health-wellness/do-video-games-cause-aggressive-behavior(Links to an external site.)

David L. Hudson Jr., 2. (2018). Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association. Retrieved March 09, 2021, fromhttps://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1382/brown-v-entertainment-merchants-association#:~:text=In%20Brown%20v.%20Entertainment%20Merchant