IT Planning at ModMeters

Brian Smith, CIO of ModMeters, groaned inwardly as he listened to CEO John Johnson wrapping up his remarks. So our executive team thinks there are real business opportunities for us in developing these two new strategic thrusts. But before I go to the board for final approval next month, I need to know that our IT, marketing, and sales plans will support us all the way, Johnson concluded.

Brian mentally calculated the impact these new initiatives would have on his organization. He had heard rumors from his boss, the COO, that something big was coming down. He had even been asked his opinion about whether these strategies were technically doable, theoretically. But both at once? Resourcespeople, time, and moneywere tight, as usual. ModMeters was making a reasonable profit, but the CFO, Stan Abrams, had always kept the lid screwed down tightly on IT spending. Brian had to fight for every dime. How he was going to find the wherewithal to support not one but two new strategic initiatives, he didnt know.

The other VPs at this strategy presentation were smiling. Taking ModMeters global from a North American operation seemed to be a logical next step for the company. Its products, metering components of all types, were highly specialized and in great demand from such diverse customers as utility companies, manufacturers, and a host of other industries. Originally founded as Modern Meters, the firm had grown steadily as demand for its metering expertise and components had grown over the past century or so. Today ModMeters was the largest producer of metering components in the world with a full range of both mechanical and now digital products. Expanding into meter assembly with plants in Asia and Eastern Europe was a good plan, thought Brian, but he wasnt exactly sure how he was going to get the infrastructure in place to support it. Many of these countries simply dont have the telecommunications and equipment we are going to need, and the training and new systems we have to put in place are going to be substantial, he said.

But it was the second strategic thrust that was going to give him nightmares, he predicted. How on earth did they expect him to put direct-to-customer sales in place so they could sell green electric meters to individual users? His attention was jerked back to the present by a flashy new logo on an easel that the CEO had just unveiled.

In keeping with our updated strategy, may I present our new nameMM! Johnson announced portentously.

Oh, this is just great, thought Brian. Now I have to go into every single application and every single document this company produces and change our name!

Because of its age and scientific orientation, ModMeters (as he still preferred to call it) had been in the IT business a long time. Starting back in the early 1960s, the company had gradually automated almost every aspect of its business from finance and accounting to supply chain management. About the only thing it didnt have was a fancy Web site for consumers, although even that was about to change. ModMeters currently had systems reflecting just about every era of computers from punch cards to PCs. Unfortunately, the company never seemed to have the resources to invest in reengineering its existing systems. It just layered more systems on top of the others. A diagram of all the interactions among systems looked like a plate of spaghetti. There was no way they were going to be able to support two new strategic thrusts with their current budget levels, he thought, as he applauded the new design along with the others. Next weeks IT budget meeting is going to be a doozy!

Sure enough, the following week found them all, except for the CEO, back in the same meeting room, ready to do battle. Holding his fire, Brian waited until all the VPs had presented their essential IT initiatives. In addition to what needed to be done to support the new business strategies, each division had a full laundry list of essentials for maintaining the current business of the firm. Even Stan had gotten into the act this year because of new legislation that gave the firms outside auditors immense scope to peer into the inner workings of every financial and governance process the organization had.

After listening carefully to each speaker in turn, Brian stood up. As many of you know, we have always been cautious about how we spend our IT budget. We have been given a budget that is equal to 2 percent of revenues, which seriously limits what we in IT have been able to do for the company. Every year we spend a lot of time paring our project list down to bare bones, and every year we make do with a patchwork of infrastructure investments. We are now at the point where 80 percent of our budget in IT is fixed. Heres how we spend our money. Brian clicked on a PowerPoint presentation showing a multicolored pie chart.

This large chunk in blue is just about half our budget, he stated. This is simply the cost of keeping the lights onrunning our systems and replacing a bare minimum of equipment. The red chunk is about 30 percent of the pie. This is the stuff we have to dofixing errors, dealing with changes mandated by government and our own industry, and providing essential services like the help desk. How we divide up the remainder of the pie is what this meeting is all about.

Brian clicked to a second slide showing a second pie chart. As you know, we have typically divided up the remaining IT budget proportionately, according to who has the biggest overall operating budget. This large pink chunk is you, Fred. Brian gestured at Fred Tompkins, head of manufacturing and the most powerful executive in the room. It was his division that made the firms profit. The pink chunk easily took up more than half of the pie. Tompkins smiled. Brian went on, pointing out the slice that each part of the firm had been allotted in the previous year. Finally, we come to Harriet and Brenda, he said with a smile. Harriet Simpson and Brenda Barnes were the VPs of human resources and marketing, respectively. Their tiny slivers were barely visiblejust a few percent of the total budget.

This approach to divvying up our IT budget may have served us well over the years (Brian didnt think it had but he wasnt going to fight past battles), however, we all heard what John said last week, and this approach to budgeting doesnt give us any room to develop our new strategies or cover our new infrastructure or staffing needs. Although we might get a little more money to obtain some new applications and buy some more computersAbrams nodded slightlyit wont get us where we need to go in the future.

A third graph went up on the screen, showing the next five years. If we dont do something now to address our IT challenges, within five years our entire IT budget will be eaten up by just operations and maintenance. In the past we have paid minimal attention to our infrastructure or our information and technology architecture or to reengineering our existing systems and processes. A diagram of the spaghetti flashed on. This is what youre asking me to manage in a cost-effective manner. It isnt pretty. We need a better plan for making our systems more robust and flexible. The foundation just isnt there for us to be moving in new directions with this firm. Stan, you should be worried that we wont be able to give our auditors what they ask for. But you should also be worried about our risk exposure if one of these systems fails and about how we are going to integrate two new business ventures into this mess.

Tompkins looked up from his papers. It was clear he wasnt pleased with where this presentation was headed. Well, I for one need everything Ive asked for on my list, he stated flatly. You cant expect me to be the cash cow of the organization and not enable me to make the money we need to invest elsewhere.

Brian was conciliatory. Im not saying that you dont, Fred. Im just saying that weve been given a new strategic direction from the top and that some things are going to have to change to enable IT to support the whole enterprise better. For example, until now we have always prioritized divisional IT projects on the basis of ROI. How should we prioritize these new strategic initiatives? Furthermore, these new ventures will require a lot of additional infrastructure, so we need to figure out a way to afford this. Right now our systems dont talk to the ones running in other divisions because they dont use the same terminology. But in the future, if were going to have systems that wont cost increasing amounts of our budget, we are going to have to simplify and integrate them better.

Tompkins clearly hadnt considered the enterprises needs at all. He scowled but said nothing. Brian continued, We are being asked to do some new things in the company. Obviously, John hopes theres going to be a payback, but it may take a while. New strategies dont always bear fruit right away. Now looking at Stan, he said pointedly, Theres more to IT value than short-term profit. Part of our business strategy is to make new markets for our company. That requires investment, not only in equipment and product, but also in the underlying processes and information we need to manage and monitor that investment.

Harriet Simpson spoke for the first time. Its like when we hire someone new in R&D. We hire for quality because we want their ideas and innovation, not just a warm body. I think we need to better understand how we are going to translate our five key corporate objectives into IT projects. Yes, we need to make a profit, but Stan needs to satisfy regulators and Brendas going to be on the hot seat when we start marketing to individuals. And we havent even spoken about Teds needs. As the VP of R&D, Ted Kwok was tasked with keeping one or more steps ahead of the competition. New types of products and customer needs would mean expansion in his area as well.

Stan cleared his throat. All of you are right. As I see it, we are going to have to keep the cash flowing from Freds area while we expand. But Brians got a point. We may be being penny wise and pound foolish if we dont think things through more carefully. Weve put a lot of effort into developing this new strategy, and there will be some extra money for IT but not enough to do that plus everything all of you want. We need to retrench and regroup and move forward at the same time.

There was silence in the room. Stan had an annoying way of stating the obvious without really helping to move the ball forward. Brian spoke again. The way I see it, we have to understand two things before we can really make a new budget. First, we need to figure out how each of the IT projects weve got on the table contributes to one of our key corporate objectives. Second, we need to figure out a way to determine the value of each to ModMeters so that we can prioritize it. Then I need to incorporate a reasonable amount of IT regeneration so that we can continue to do new projects at all.

Everyone was nodding now. Brian breathed a small sigh of relief. That was step one accomplished. But step two was going to be harder. We have a month to get back to the board with our assurances that the IT plan can incorporate the new strategies and what were going to need in terms of extra funds to do this. As I said earlier, this is not just a matter of throwing money at the problem. What we need is a process for IT planning and budgeting that will serve us well over the next few years. This process will need to accomplish a number of things: It will need to take an enterprise perspective on IT. Were all in these new strategies together. It will have to incorporate all types of IT initiativesour new strategies, the needs of Fred and others for the new IT to operate and improve our existing business, Stans new auditing needs, and our operations and maintenance needs. In addition, we must find some way of allocating some of the budget to fixing the mess we have in IT right now. It must provide a better way to connect new IT work with our corporate objectives. It must help us prioritize projects with different types of value. Finally, it must ensure we have the business and IT resources in place to deliver that value.

Looking at each of his colleagues in turn, he asked, Now how are we going to do this?

Questions

1. Write what you think ModMeters' mission is.
2. Write what you think ModMeters' IT mission should be based upon the mission you identified in the previous question.
3. Based upon the case and our definition of strategy, describe one business strategy that they are trying to implement.
4. Using the business strategy identified, write an IT strategy that would support that business strategy.
5. Based upon our definition of operational plan, write three operational planning statements that should be used to carry out the IT strategy identified in the previous question. (Remember operational plans have specifics, i.e. time, responsible party, budget, activities, etc.)
6. Describe two additional steps that ModMeters could take to align business and IT.