It's been suggested that one way of summarizing the course would be that it explores the tension between selfishness and selflessness. Is this a fair summary of what this course tries to do? Why or why not? Use specific examples from ethics, psychology and communication to support your argument. One could argue that ethics ( decisions about behaviour), psychology (patterns of behaviour), and interpersonal communication (language/gestures for behaviour) each offer strategies to achieve pro-social relations. Which of these knowledge- based strategies is most useful and why? Use specific examples from the course materials to support your argument. How might a student who has taken this course be a better employee, manager, or entrepreneur than a student who has not? Ensure your answer relates to each module: ethics, psychology and interpersonal communication,. Use specific examples from ethics, psychology and communication, plus your own experience, to support your argument. In your opinion, to what degree can pro-social behaviour in adults be taught, modified, or improved? Use specific examples from ethics, psychology and communication, plus your own experience, to support your argument. If you were devising a workplace policy for how employees should behave in challenging interpersonal situations, how might your strategy integrate three of the following theories/concepts: social contract ethics; social learning theory; social actions (e.g. conformity, obedience); communication competence? Use specific examples from the theories you selected to support your argument