Jacques has a Personal Automobile Policy $($PAP$)$ that provides liability coverage with limits of $$50/100/50,$ no medical payment insurance, and uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage with limits of $$100/300.$ He has collision and comprehensive coverage, both of which have a $$500$ deductible.

Suppose one day Jacques fails to notice a red light, causing him to blindside another car crossing the intersection. Fortunately, he is not badly injured, but the medical bill for his hospital examination nonetheless amounts to $$1,938.$ The driver of the other car, a woman named Kyoko, suffered severe injuries from the direct impact of the accident, requiring an initial surgery, an extended hospital stay, and additional physical therapy procedures for several subsequent months. The total of her medical bills, plus compensation for being unable to work for nearly a month, totaled $$135,947.$ Kyoko$$s insurance company successfully filed a claim against Jacques by exercising subrogation rights.

Coverage A of Jacques$$s plan will reimburse him for of Kyoko$$s medical bills. Jacques$$s medical bills $.$

Jacques$$s car was relatively unharmed by the collision but required $1,200$ in minor repairs. Kyoko$$s car was destroyed, making Jacques liable for paying the $$10,400$ replacement value. Kyoko$$s car was pushed up onto a nearby sidewalk on impact, destroying a nearby lawn and causing additional damage to a parked car. This damage totaled $$8,693.$

Jacques$$s liability coverage also will reimburse him for up to worth of property damage. Therefore, he is responsible for paying out$-$of$-$pocket in property liability damages. Which of the following is true regarding the damage to his own car?

It will be reimbursed up to the difference between his liability coverage and the damage to other property.

It is not covered under his policy.

It will be reimbursed fully, minus the $$500$ deductible.