Jeff drafts a contract that contains terms that appear vague and ambiguous to the average person. Jane, the other party sues Jeff.

The court will declare Jeff's behavior as a tort due to intentional ambiguity of terms.

The court will give the terms the meaning as per trade usage.

The court will reject Jane's attempt to reinterpret the terms after the contract has been signed.

The court will interpret the ambiguous and vague terms against Jeff because he is the party that drafted the contract.

The court will declare the entire contract as void.