Jenny and Karla had been dating for approximately 2 years. One night, they attended the wedding of a mutual friend. At the reception, they talked about how beautiful the wedding ceremony was and looked forward to the day they could do the same. They both agreed they should take their relationship to the next level and move in together. However, Karla expressed her concerns about any financial arrangements because, having been married before, she was ruined financially by the divorce. It took years for her to recover from the debt associated with her costly divorce, and in return, the stress caused her business to suffer. Jenny understood Karla's concern, and because she had aced her family law class at Concord, she proceeded to draft a cohabitation agreement on several napkins. Several years later, upon separation, Jenny sues Karla for failure to comply with the cohabitation agreement. In this case, a court would likely rule that ____________. Question 7 options: a) contracts cannot be written on napkins; thus, the agreement would be void b) besides a hastily drafted contract on a cocktail napkin by a law student, Karla was likely under duress considering her surroundings and the untimeliness of the agreement c) the fact the cohabitation agreement was executed on a napkin would not make it void so long as there was adequate consideration d) cohabitation agreements would not apply to same-sex relationships