Jim is pulled over by the Santa Barbara Police Department for failing to signal. The officer asks Jim if he can take a look inside his car, and Jim says "sure". The officer finds drugs in Jim's glove compartment and Jim is charged with a crime.

In the criminal trial, Jim tries to have the case dropped because the drugs were found in an illegal search and the officer did not have a warrant. The judge will find:

Group of answer choices

The drugs are admissible in court because Jim waived his $4$th amendment right by consenting to a search of his car.

The drugs are inadmissible because the police officer did not have a search warrant.

The drugs are admissible because search warrants are not required for cars.

The drugs are admissible because they were in plain view of the officer.