Jimmy is in a trial for extortion. He invites Ed to his hotel room to discuss the trial and how Ed might be able to influence one of the jury members to vote for his acquittal. Unknown to Jimmy, Ed was earlier arrested by the FBI for loan sharking. Ed agreed with law enforcement authorities to wear a wire in order to record his conversation with Jimmy. Based on the recording of the conversation, the FBI then filed new charges against Jimmy for jury tampering. How is a court most likely to respond to the admissibility of the taped conversation between Jimmy and Ed? Group of answer choices The statement will be admissible because a hotel room is not a protected area with respect to the right to privacy The statement will be inadmissible as a violation of the Fourth Amendment The statement will be admissible because it was freely communicated to Ed with an awareness that Ed might disclose it The statement will be inadmissible as a violation of the constitutional prohibition against self-incrimination