JOE went to BOB's house and while he was there, he noticed that BOB had a 1967 Chevrolet in his garage. JOE told BOB that he had been looking for such a car for several years and couldn't find one. JOE looked the car over and then told BOB that he would buy the car for $10,000.00. BOB said: "Fine, I accept your Offer. I will sell the car for $10,000.00". JOE then wrote out a check for $1,000.00 and told BOB he would pay him the rest in a week. BOB took the check from JOE and cashed it. Later in the week, JOE showed up to pay BOB the rest of the purchase price and to pick up the car, BUT, BOB told JOE that he, BOB, had changed his mind and would not sell JOE the car.

JOE now sues BOB claiming that they had a Contract and that the Court should force BOB to sell him the car. BOB states: "There never was a Contract. Nothing was in writing and, I am also entitled to change my mind."

Question 1 JOE vs. BOB

Whatlegal Defenses could BOB use to avoid having to sell the car to JOE? Set forth the exact LAW(s) that BOB could use to support each of his Defenses.

Question 2 JOE's Responses

What Legal Responses (Defenses), if any, could JOE use in order to defeat the Defenses of BOB? Set forth the exact LAW(s) JOE could use to support his position and defeateach of BOB's Defenses.