Joe's friend Mike is the subject of a telephone wiretap in a heroin drug distribution investigation. During the wiretap, the police learn that Joe is Mike's drug supplier, and Mike is the top drug distributor in his area. Both Joe and Mike are charged with conspiracy to distribute heroin. During the discovery process Mike's defense attorney discovers that the wiretap was illegally obtained. Mike's attorney successfully has all of the evidence that was obtained during and as a result of the wire tap, suppressed as to Mike; seeing his success, Joe's attorney files a motion to suppress the same evidence against Joe. In this case, the likely outcome will be . . . Group of answer choices because the evidence was illegally obtained, it will be suppressed against Joe as well although it was illegally obtained, the evidence will not be suppressed against Joe this scenario does not contain enough facts to decide