Judging by Mishra's selection, what enrages different groups about globalization, and how might the "globalization of rage" itself unfold? He associates globalization especially with the advancement of free markers, democratic institutions, and liberal values; based on your reading of other items in this Reader, do you think this is a good way to think of globalization? Do you see any differences in the way Haidt and Mishra explain and assess similar "extremist" reactions to globalization?

(The Globalization Reader 6th Edition)