just need answer number 3.

1. Christina Peterson, Hector Gonzolas. of genetically engineer copied some of their work. The com by independent research and not by their rights against the compe of the lawsuit is that the cas not be familiar en so arrive at the proper rest 2 Laurence David, M.D. sued Patil answered the complai Subsequently, both parties X. Chapter Problems Hector Gonzolas, and John Ping are involved in the development and licensing gineered agricultural products. Unfortunately, it appears as though a competitor has work. The competitor alleges that the genetically engineered plans were developed Search and not by using any of their work. They decide that it is necessary to protect inst the competitor and are considering filing a lawsuit. However, one of the drawbacks that the case is extremely complicated and there is a fear that a judge and/or jury will nough with the complex issues, nor be able to educate themselves at the trial, in order dve at the proper result. What may be a better choice for them than litigation? sued Patrick Abergel, M.D. for damages for breach of contract. Abergel complaint and cross-complained against David for damages arising from the same contract. lu both parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit and submit their disputes to arbitration. They the Honorable Judge Doolittle, retired, as the arbitrator, giving him the power to "grant any medy or relief for which a party is entitled under California law." ving the arbitration hearing, the arbitrator denied all relief requested by David, awarding Abergel of 59335.02. The arbitrator found that David had "fabricated a carpet of illusion" based upon laint that was an attempt ... to weave a claim from threads of false statements, described Durid's claims as "patently ridiculous, bizarre, absolutely false and so incorrect and unsupported by the sidence as to be tragic," found that David and his witnesses took so many "inconsistent positions" and discovered at trial that it appeared they all suffered from "chronological dyslexia." As a result of the frivolous action by David, Abergel submitted a motion to the arbitrator to award sanction for Abergel's attorney's fees in resolving the dispute. In an attempt to discourage frivolous lawsuits, California Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 provides that judges and arbitrators may penalize a party for bringing frivolous litigation or arbitration by awarding sanctions making the frivolous party pay, among other things, attorney's fees. David objected that the power given to the arbitrator did not allow for the awarding of attorney's fees as sanctions. Nevertheless, the arbitrator awarded $75,000 to Abergel. Is David correct and why or why not? 3. Plaintiff Tri-Cor, Inc., and the defendant, City of Hawthorne, had entered into a contract for the construction by the plaintiff of an airport administration building. The contract did not contain an tion clause. Construction was delayed and plaintiff sued for relief alleging the delay was due of the city. The city filed an answer and a cross-complaint, alleging that the delay was due the plaintiff and seeking damages from Tri-Cor, Inc. The attorneys for the plaintiff and the they discussed the possibility of arbitration. Both attorneys agreed to arbitration but the city Sree to arbitration. The plaintiff sued to compel arbitration. Must the City of Hawthorne Tefused to agree to arbitratio arbitrate and why or why not? Look at problem 3 on page 101. Must the city of Hawthorne arbitrate and why or why not? 1. Christina Peterson, Hector Gonzolas. of genetically engineer copied some of their work. The com by independent research and not by their rights against the compe of the lawsuit is that the cas not be familiar en so arrive at the proper rest 2 Laurence David, M.D. sued Patil answered the complai Subsequently, both parties X. Chapter Problems Hector Gonzolas, and John Ping are involved in the development and licensing gineered agricultural products. Unfortunately, it appears as though a competitor has work. The competitor alleges that the genetically engineered plans were developed Search and not by using any of their work. They decide that it is necessary to protect inst the competitor and are considering filing a lawsuit. However, one of the drawbacks that the case is extremely complicated and there is a fear that a judge and/or jury will nough with the complex issues, nor be able to educate themselves at the trial, in order dve at the proper result. What may be a better choice for them than litigation? sued Patrick Abergel, M.D. for damages for breach of contract. Abergel complaint and cross-complained against David for damages arising from the same contract. lu both parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit and submit their disputes to arbitration. They the Honorable Judge Doolittle, retired, as the arbitrator, giving him the power to "grant any medy or relief for which a party is entitled under California law." ving the arbitration hearing, the arbitrator denied all relief requested by David, awarding Abergel of 59335.02. The arbitrator found that David had "fabricated a carpet of illusion" based upon laint that was an attempt ... to weave a claim from threads of false statements, described Durid's claims as "patently ridiculous, bizarre, absolutely false and so incorrect and unsupported by the sidence as to be tragic," found that David and his witnesses took so many "inconsistent positions" and discovered at trial that it appeared they all suffered from "chronological dyslexia." As a result of the frivolous action by David, Abergel submitted a motion to the arbitrator to award sanction for Abergel's attorney's fees in resolving the dispute. In an attempt to discourage frivolous lawsuits, California Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 provides that judges and arbitrators may penalize a party for bringing frivolous litigation or arbitration by awarding sanctions making the frivolous party pay, among other things, attorney's fees. David objected that the power given to the arbitrator did not allow for the awarding of attorney's fees as sanctions. Nevertheless, the arbitrator awarded $75,000 to Abergel. Is David correct and why or why not? 3. Plaintiff Tri-Cor, Inc., and the defendant, City of Hawthorne, had entered into a contract for the construction by the plaintiff of an airport administration building. The contract did not contain an tion clause. Construction was delayed and plaintiff sued for relief alleging the delay was due of the city. The city filed an answer and a cross-complaint, alleging that the delay was due the plaintiff and seeking damages from Tri-Cor, Inc. The attorneys for the plaintiff and the they discussed the possibility of arbitration. Both attorneys agreed to arbitration but the city Sree to arbitration. The plaintiff sued to compel arbitration. Must the City of Hawthorne Tefused to agree to arbitratio arbitrate and why or why not? Look at problem 3 on page 101. Must the city of Hawthorne arbitrate and why or why not