Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. At her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and he two daughters if she did not. Her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Karin had acted freely. Instead, the judge told the jury that Karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. Who is correct?

At her criminal trial, Karin is the

If Karin's boyfriend is not also a defendant in the criminal trial, he will probably be :

$3$ has the burden of proving that Karin acted under duress?

Duress will have to be proven by the standard of

The government have to prove that Karin was predisposed to commit the crime:

If Karin did buy the guns because she was afraid of her boyfriend, her action