Karolyn bought a new dishwasher from a nationally known appliance store and paid the store extra to install the dishwasher. Six months later, the floor in her kitchen began to rot and mildew started appearing in the cabinets around the dishwasher. Upon getting the floor and cabinets replaced, it was discovered that the dishwasher had been installed incorrectly causing a water leak, which in turn caused the rotting and mildew. Karolyn sued the store for the repairs. The store claimed that it is not responsible for the quality of the work, but only for the installation of the dishwasher. What would be the likely outcome in this case?

a$.$ The store would not have to pay for the repairs but would have to provide her with a new dishwasher.

b$.$ Karolyn would be required to pay for all the repairs because she should not have believed that the installation was done correctly.

c$.$ The store would not be required to pay for anything as it installed the dishwasher, and there were no implied terms in the contract.

d$.$ The store would be required to pay for the repairs under the implied terms of the contract that the work be performed properly.