Kicked back to the left and cut off rea right arm to the elbow. Pearce, through his mother, Ca Charlotte Karns, sued Emerson to recover damages 19 under strict liability. Is Emerson liable? Karns v. fo Emerson Electric Co., 817 F.2d 1452, Web 1987 U.S. App. Lexis 5608 (United States Court of Appeals for 6 the Tenth Circuit) b fa 4 Crashworthiness Doctrine One night Verne Prior, r while driving on U.S. 101 under the influence of alcohol and drugs at speeds of 65 to 85 miles per hour, crashed his automobile into the left rear of a Chevrolet station wagon stopped on the shoulder of the freeway because of a flat tire. Christine Smith was sitting in the passenger seat of the parked car when the accident occurred. In the crash, the Chev- rolet station wagon was knocked into a gully, where its fuel tank ruptured. The vehicle caught fire, and Smith suffered severe burn injuries. The Chevrolet station wagon was manufactured by General Motors Corporation. Evidence showed that the fuel tank was located in a vulnerable position in the back of the station wagon, outside the crossbars of the frame. Evidence further showed that if the fuel tank had been located underneath the body of the station wagon, between the crossbars of the frame, it would have been well protected in the collision. Smith sued General Motors for strict liability. Is the Chevrolet station wagon a defective product? Smith v. General Motors Corporation, 42 Cal.App.3d 1, 116 Cal. Rptr. 575, Web 1974 Cal.App. Lexis 1199 (Court of Appeal of California) 5 Misuse The Wilcox-Crittendon Company manu- factured harnesses, saddles, bridles, leads, and other tems commonly used for horses, cattle, and other ranch and farm animals. One such item was a stallion or cattle tie, a 5-inch-long iron hook with a 1-inch ing at one end. The tongue on the ring opened out- vard to allow the hook to be attached to a rope or an chasing agent for United Airli