Kindly help me answer all the following questions please. An occasion coordinator is planing a program for a gathering of 20 individuals who need to set out on a touring trip. Because of space limitations at the offices to be visited the orga-nizer parts the gathering into five non-void subgroups. The quantity of individuals in the subgroups may change starting with one subgroup then onto the next.

(a) what number various parcels are there if the fourth subgroup is comprised of 6 individuals?

(b) what number various parts are there if the second and fourth subgroups have 4 and 6 individuals separately?

An occasion coordinator is planing a program for a gathering of 20 individuals who need to set out on a touring trip. Because of space requirements at the offices to be visited the orga-nizer parcels the gathering into five non-void subgroups. The quantity of individuals in the subgroups may shift starting with one subgroup then onto the next.

(a) what number various parcels are there if the fourth subgroup is comprised of 6 individuals?

(b) what number various parts are there if the second and fourth subgroups have 4 and 6 individuals separately?

(c) The coordinator picks a segment of individuals at arbitrary. Discover the likelihood that the quantity of individuals in the second and fourth subgroups of the picked parcel are not 4 and 6 separately.

Here are the noticed frequencies from four classes: 5, 6, 8, 13.

@19@

Expect we need to utilize a 0.05 importance level to test the case that the four classes are on the whole similarly likely. (Integrity of fit test)

What is the invalid theory?

What are the normal recurrence for every one of the four classifications?

What is the estimation of the test measurement?

What is the basic worth?

What do you finish up about the given case?

The retirement ages of a gathering of steel laborers are recorded underneath. Develop a histogram with 4 classes utilizing Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets, or GeoGebra. You will transfer the diagram in the following inquiry.

{64,60,57,63,61,64,50,62,60,56,53,62,54,60,64,53,61,58,60,64,57,56,64,61,63}

What is the populace mean of the information?

What is the populace change? (Round to four decimal spots. Note: s^2 implies s2

What is the populace standard deviation? (Round to four decimal spots)

The information is

As indicated by Chebyshev's hypothesis, in any event 88.9% of the information falls between around 47.62 and ___________. (Round to the closest 100th

Question Two. (6 Marks): Your organization is considering the use of group decision making. You have read about decision making and are trying to inform your manager about the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making. Give TWO examples to explain when group decision making is recommended over Individual decision making and TWO examples when Individual decision making is better.12 15 Short-term decision making differs from long-term decision making because: Short-term decision making assumes that variable costs are fixed. Short-term decision making assumes selling prices are fixed. Short-term decision making assumes capacity is fixed. Short-term decision making assumes the accounting data is fixed. 13 5 1626. Table: Homer, Marge Payoff Table Marge (utility) Go to Ball Game Go to Opera Homer Go to Ball Game 50, 50 45, 45 (utility) Go to Opera 0, 45 48, 60 Refer to the table. The Nash equilibrium is (are): O (50, 50) and (48, 60). O (0, 45). O (45, 45). O (48, 60) and (45, 45). 27. Game theory is the study of: O random decision making. O strategic decision making. O cartel decision making. O decision making allowing for irrational behavior. Remaining: 1:37:00 Start: 6:39 PM 9 re W e 99% J C lenovoQuestion 9 0/1p What are the two schools of thought regarding appellate decision making? legal model of decision making and attitudinal model of decision making attitudinal model of decision making and deliberation model of decision making deliberation model of decision making and intuitive model of decision making intuitive model of decision making and therapeutic jurisprudence decision making