Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Kralik v Mount Seymour Resorts ( 2 0 0 8 ) BCCA 9 7 Kralik, an experienced skier, was trying to clear some snow and
Kralik v Mount Seymour Resorts BCCA
Kralik, an experienced skier, was trying to clear some snow and ice from the chair of a chairlift as it moved towards him from the boarding ramp.
Too focused on this task, he failed to seat himself in time.
Instead of moving away and waiting for the next chair, Kralik instinctively grabbed onto the chair he had been cleaning and dangled from it as the chair began to ascend.
He let go and fell about to an embankment below.
His right shoulder sustained injury, causing him loss of future earning capacity. Was the ski resort negligent?
Was kralik contributory negligent for failing to pay intension as the chair appeoached him and grabbing onto it at the last second.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started