Laim finds a dog wandering around in a park when he goes for his walk. He is confident that the dog is lost, so he stays with the dog. A short while later, the owner of the dog runs towards Liam and thanks him for finding his lost dog. Liam is happy that the dog is reunited with its owner . On his way home from his lost dog. Liam is happy that the dog is returned with its owner. On his way home from his walk, he sees a reward notice for the lost dog that he has just found. So, he turns around quickly and asks the owner of the dog for the advertised reward of $100, but the owner refuses to pay him. How would a court view this situation?

A) Liam must be aware that the offer exists before he is entitled to the $100 reward.

b) A reward notice is similar to an advertisement, so it would only be considered an invitation to treat, rather than an offer.

c) Anyone who returned the dog would be entitled to the $100 reward, regardless of whether they had seen the reward notice or not.