Laura Connor just completed a fraud investigation during which she discovered that the bookkeeper had embezzled $103,240.25. The bookkeeper would not confess, but she had an airtight case against him. In her final report, Laura wrote, An analysis of the accounts receivables records and bank records indicates that $103,240.25 in funds cannot be accounted for. Carlos Bowles, the CEO, was very unhappy with the report. He was trying to get the police to investigate the case, but they would not because the statement in the report was so weak. He wanted Lauras report to clearly indicate that the funds were stolen and that the records suggested the guilty person. Furthermore, a police investigator asked Laura for her opinion regarding the suspects guilt off-the-record.

How should Laura respond?