LAWZM: Statutory-Regulatory Search FALL 2023 You are required to perform a statutory d: regulatory search in regard to this fact pattern: Harry's Hot Water Heaters (\"Harry's\" or the \"Comp-any") is located in Toronto. Harry's is known for going door-to-door and signing customers up for rent-to-own hot water heater contracts by having residents sign up contracts. Nick signed up for a hot water rental contract for $50 per month for ve years. Recently, Nick tried to sell his home in order to retire and move to Thailand, and found out that there was a lien for the hot water heater equipment against his property's title, which stated the value of the lien was $200,000. This became the subject of a major news investigative report related to customers nding out they had liens on their property which they were unaware of or which weren't brought to their attention when they signed their contracts with Harry's. Nick has come to you upset with Harry's. The media report claims consumers can take a number of legal and regulatory actions against Harry's if necessary. Nick has retained you to advise him on whether it is possible, based on the rules and regulations set out in Ontario's Consumer Protection Act, for any remedies and penalties based on the fact pattern against Hat-ifs. In answering this question, be sure to analyze the specic wording of the sections, justify your interpretation of the wording, and indicate what additional information or clarication is required to answer the question. Disclaimer: This is a hypothetical scenario for educational purposes and not based on real events. Your response must be typed double-spaced, in narrative form, and no more than 500 words long, using a 12 point Times New Roman font and with a 1" margin for all edges of the page. It is to be submitted to Turnitin no later than the assigned due date. Your response must be a product of your own work. No collaboration is permitted. Format: For each relevant section make sure you have: stated each section and subsection number that determines the answer as a Heading; explained what legal rights/wrongs the section's wording provides, and explain how that answers the question set out above. Example: Section 2 Interpretation (PIPEDA) - (Not related to this assignment) Pursuant to section 2, a breach of security safeguards means the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information resulting from a breach of an organization's security safeguards that are referred to in clause 4.7 of Schedule 1 or from a failure to establish those safeguards. Under PIPEDA, an organization needs to establish security safeguards to protect personal information. In the fact pattern, there is insufficient information to determine whether there were any safeguards in place