Leadership related to staff turnover

Correlation analyses were performed between each of the three leadership dimensions and the staff turnover at the unit level, i.e. the means of each dimension for each manager (n 52), were compared with the staff turnover in their units. The correlation coefficients were 20.33 (employee orientation), 20.22 (change orientation), and 20.15 (production orientation). The correlation between staff turnover and employee orientation was statistically significant ( p , 0.05). The correlation between the mean of all three dimensions (mean of leadership behaviour), and staff turnover was 20.25. After controlling for job satisfaction and work climate, the partial correlation coefficients between the leadership dimensions and staff turnover did not show any statistical significance, being 20.23 (employee orientation), 20.10 (change orientation), 20.01 (production orientation), and 20.12 (the mean of leadership behaviour). When dividing the units into five groups according to staff turnover (1 0 percent, 2 0.5-5 percent, 3 5.5-10 percent, 4 10.5-15 percent, and 5 .15 percent), there were significant differences (post hoc p # 0.5), between group 1 and 5 in employee orientation and between group 2 and 3 in production orientation (Table I). No statistically significant differences in turnover were found for the four different groups of leadership profiles. The means for staff turnover were; "invisible" 10. 00, "middle" 7.38, "super" 7.17 and "odd" 6.00.

9. Examine the Leadership related to staff turnover on page 6 (174)

a. For Leadership related to staff turnover analysis, what were the performed correlation analyses? Which one did have a significant correlation and which one did not have significant correlation? Please repot the variable and their correlations.

b. What can you tell about the relationship between those variables?