** legal environment business**

ethical case study

Apple Suppliers & Labor Practices

With its highly coveted line of consumer electronics, Apple has a cult following among loyal consumers. During the 2014 holiday season, 74.5 million iPhones were sold. Demand like this meant that Apple was in line to make over $52 billion in profits in 2015, the largest annual profit ever generated from a companys operations. Despite its consistent financial performance year over year, Apples robust profit margin hides a more complicated set of business ethics. Similar to many products sold in the U.S., Apple does not manufacture most its goods domestically. Most of the component sourcing and factory production is done overseas in conditions that critics have argued are dangerous to workers and harmful to the environment.

For example, tin is a major component in Apples products and much of it is sourced in Indonesia. Although there are mines that source tin ethically, there are also many that do not. One study found workersmany of them childrenworking in unsafe conditions, digging tin out by hand in mines prone to landslides that could bury workers alive. About 70% of the tin used in electronic devices such as smartphones and tablets comes from these more dangerous, small-scale mines. An investigation by the BBC revealed how perilous these working conditions can be. In interviews with miners, a 12-year-old working at the bottom of a 70-foot cliff of sand said: I worry about landslides. The earth slipping from up there to the bottom. It could happen.

Apple defends its practices by saying it only has so much control over monitoring and regulating its component sources. The company justifies its sourcing practices by saying that it is a complex process, with tens of thousands of miners selling tin, many of them through middle-men. In a statement to the BBC, Apple said the simplest course of action would be for Apple to unilaterally refuse any tin from Indonesian mines. That would be easy for us to do and would certainly shield us from criticism. But that would also be the lazy and cowardly path, since it would do nothing to improve the situation. We have chosen to stay engaged and attempt to drive changes on the ground.

In an effort for greater transparency, Apple has released annual reports detailing their work with suppliers and labor practices. While more recent investigations have shown some improvements to suppliers working conditions, Apple continues to face criticism as consumer demand for iPhones and other products continues to grow.

Please wwer the following gets based on the second 1. Do you think Apple should be responsible for ethical lapses made by individuals further down its supply chain? Why or why not! 2. Do you think consumers should be expected to take into the ethical track record of companies when making purchases Why or why 3. If you were part of a third-party regulating hods, weld y deal with ethically questionable business practices of multinational corporations like Apple? Would you feel obligated to do something or do you think the solution rests with the companies themsches? Explain your reasoning