Lennie bought a business class ticket from Alta Airlines. As she checked in, the managerdowngraded her to economy on the ground that a Congressman had to beaccommodated inthe business class.Lennie suffered the discomfort and embarrassment of the downgrade.She sued the airlines for quasi-delict butAlta Airlines countered that, since her travel wasgoverned by a contract between them, noquasi-delict could arise.Is the airline correct?

A. No, the breach of contract may in fact betortious as when it is tainted asin thiscase with arbitrariness, gross bad faith, and malice.

B. No, denying Lennie thecomfort and amenities of the business class as provided in theticket is a tortious act.C. Yes, since the facts show a breach of contract, not a quasi-delict.D. Yes, since quasi-delict presupposes the absence of a pre-existing contractual relationbetween the parties.