Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

less enfing work in process i need the 375000 answer which is wrong CableTech Bell Corporation (CTB) operates in the telecommunications industry. CTB has two

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

less enfing work in process i need the 375000 answer which is wrong

CableTech Bell Corporation (CTB) operates in the telecommunications industry. CTB has two divisions: the Phone Division and the Cable Service Division. The Phone Division manufactures to ophones in several plants located in the Midwest. The product lines run from relatively inexpensive touch-tone wall and desk phones to expensive, high-quality cellular phones. CTe also operates a cable TV service in Ohio. The Cable Service Division offers three products: a basic package with 25 channels, an enhanced package, which is the basic package plus 35 additional channels and two movie channels; and a premium package, which is the basic package plus 55 additional channels and six movic channels. The Cable Service Division reported the following activity for the month of March: Basic Enhanced Premium Sales (unit) 50,000 500,000 300,000 Price per unit $32 $60 $90 unit costs: Directly traced $6 $18 $36 Driver traced $4 $8 $12 Allocated $20 $26 $30 The unit costs are divided as follows: 70 percent production and 30 percent marketing and customer service. Direct labor cost is the only driver used for tracing. Typically, the division uses only production costs to define unit costs. The preceding unit product cost information was provided at the request of the marketing manager and was the result of a special study, Bryce Youngers, the president of CTB, is reasonably satisfied with the performance of the Cable Service Division. March's performance is fairly typical of what has been happening over the past two years. The Phone Division, however, is another matter. Its overall profit performance has been declining. Two years ago, income before income taxes had been about 25 percent of sales. March's dismal performance was also typical for what has been happening this year and is expected to continue- unless some action by management is taken to reverse the trend. During March, the Phone Division reported the following results: Inventories: $23,000 Materials, March 1 Materials, March 31 40,000 Work in process, March 1 130,000 Work in process, March 31 45,000 Finished quods, March 1 Finished goods, March 31 480,000 375,000 Costs: Direct labor $117.000 Plant and equipment depreciation 50,000 65,000 Materials handling Inspections 60,000 30,000 Scheduling Power 30,000 Plant supervision 12,000 21,000 Manufacturing engineering Sales commissions 120,000 Salary, sales supervisor 10,000 Supplies 17,000 Warranty work 40,000 Rework 30,000 Puring March, the Phone Division purchased materials totaling $312,000. There are no significant inventories of supplies (beginning or ending). Supplies are accounted for separately from materials. CTB's Phone Division had sales totaling $1,170,000 for March Based on March's results, Bryce decided to meet with three of the Phone Division's managers: Kim Bresshears, divisional manager; Jacob Carder, divisional controller; and Larry Hartley, sales manager. A transcript of their recorded conversation is given next: Bryce: "March's profit performance is down once again, and I think we need to see if we can identify the problems and correct it before it's too late. Kim, what's your assessment of the situation?" Kim: "Foreign competition is eating us alive-selling phones at a lower price and high quality. If we could lower our prices by 10 to 15 percent, I think that we'd regain most of our lost market share. But we also need to make sure that the quality of our products meets that of our competitors. We are spending a lot of money each month inspection, rework, and warranties. like to see these costs cut by at least 50 percent. If we could do that by improving quality, then customers would be more satisfied with our products, and we would not only regain our Farket share but increase it' Larry: 'They're right. If we could lower our prices by 10 to 15 percent, I think that we'd regain most of our lost market share. But we also need to make sure that the quality of our products meets that of our competitors. As you know, we are spending a lot of money each month on rework and warranties. That worries me. I'd like to see that warranty cost cut by 70 to 30 percent. If we could do that, then customers would be more satisfied with our products, and I bet that we would not only regain our market share but increase it." Jacob: Lowering prices without lowering per-unit costs will not help us increase our profitability. I think we need to improve our cost accounting systern. I am not confident that we really know how much each of our product lines is costing us. It may be that we are overpricing some of our units because we are overcasting them. We may be underpricing other units." Larry: "This sounds promising-especially if the overcosting is for some of our high-volume lines. A price decrease for these products would make the biggest difference and if we knew they were ever-costed, then we could offer immediate price reductions." Bryce Jacob, I need more explanation. We have been using the same cost accounting system for the last 10 years. Why would it be a problem?" bacob: "I think that our manufacturing environment has changed. Over the years, we have added a lot of different product lines. Some of these products make very different demands on our manufacturing overhead resources. We trece-or attempt to trace-overhead costs to the sirferent products using direct labor cost, a unit-based cost driver. We may be doing more allocation than tracing. If so, then we probably don't have a very good idea of our actual product costs. Ako, as you know, with the way computer technology has changed over time, it is easier and cheaper ta collect and use detailed information - Information that will allow us to assign costs more accurately. Bryce: "This may be something we should explore. Jacob, what do you suggest7 bacob: "If we want more accurate product costs and if we really want to get in the cost reduction business, then we need to understand how costs beheve. In particular, we need to understand activity cost behavior. Knowing what activities we perform, why we perform them, and how well we perform them will help us identify areas for improvement. We also need to know how the different products consume activity resources. What this boils down to is the need to use an activity-based management system. But before we jump into this, we need some idea of whether non- unit-based drivers add anything. Activity based management is not an inexpensive undertaking. So I suggest that we do a preliminary study to see if direct labor cost is adequate for tracing. If not, then maybe some non-unit-crivers might be needed. In fact, if you would like I can gather some data that will provide some evidence on the usefulness of the activity-based approach." Bryce: "What do you think, Kim? It's your division." kim: "What Jacob has said sounds promising. I think he should pursue it and do so quickly. I also think that we need to look at improving our quality. It sounds like we have a problem there. If quality could be improved, then our costs will drop. I'll talk to our quality people. Jacob, in the meantime, find out for us if moving to an activity-based system is the way to go. How much time do you need?" bacob: "I have already been gathering data. I could probably have a report within two weeks MEMO TO: Kim Bashaars Jacob Carder FROM: SUBJECT: Preliminary Analysis Based on my initial analysis, I am confident that an ABC system will offer significant improvement. For one of our conventional phone plants, I regressed total monthly overheed cost on monthly direct labor cost using the following 15 months of data: Based on my initial analysis, I am confident that an ABC system will offer significant improvement. For one of our conventional phone plants, Tregressed total monthly overhead cost on monthly direct labor cast using the following 15 months of data: Overhead Direct Labor Cost $360,000 $110,000 100,000 300,000 350,000 90.000 100,000 100,000 320,000 380,000 90.000 100,000 300,000 280,000 340,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 410,000 115,000 375,000 100,000 85,000 360,000 340,000 85,000 330,000 90,000 300,000 80,000 The results were revealing. Although direct labor cost appears to be a driver of overhead cost, it really doesn't explain a lot of the variation. I then searched for other drivers-particularly non-unit drivers-that might offer more insight into overhead cost behavior. Every time a batch is produced, material movement cours, regardless of the size of the batch. The number of moves seemed like a more logical driver. I was able to gather only 10 months of data for this. (Our information system doesn't provide the number of moves, so I had to build the data set by interviewing production personnel.) This information is provided next: Materials-Handling Cost Number of Moves $80,000 1,500 60,000 1,000 1,250 70,000 72,000 65,000 1,300 1,100 1,700 85,000 67,000 1,200 73,500 1,350 1,400 83,000 84,000 1,700 99,000 1,700 The regression results were impressive. There is no question in my mind that the number of moves is a good driver of materials-harding costs. Using the number of moves to assign materials-handling costs to products would likely be better than the cost assignment using direct labor cast. Furthermore, since small batches use the same number of moves as large batches, we have some evidence that we may be overcosting our high volume products. Kim, you expressed the desire of reducing the costs of inspection, rewarking, and warranties. In addition to the pilot study for one plant, i also collected information about these three activities for the division. For the inspection activity, we have 15 inspectors wha are paid an average of $4,000 per month. Each inspector offers a practical Inspection capacity of 2,000 hours per year. However, it appears that inspectors actually work only about 80 percent of those hours. Rework cost is simply the cost of repiscing some faulty components and the associated direct labor. The rework cost per unit is predictable and constant per unit regardless of the product model. Warranty cust, on the other hand, involves the salaries of two technicians, with the remaining cost, the cost of replacement components, which is relatively constant per unit repaired. The technicians are paid $5,000 per month and pravide 2,000 hours of service per year. Warranty service usually requires 3.600 technician hours per year. After receiving the memo, Kim was intrigued, both by the activity-based costing pilot study and by the potential savings for the division by improving quality. She then asked Jacob to use the same phone plant as a pilot for a preliminary AAC analysis. She instructed him to assign al overhead costs to the plant's two products (Regular and Deluxe models), using only four activities. The four activities were rework, maving materials, inspecting products, and a general catch-all activity labeled "other manufacturing activities. From the special study already performed, she knew that materials handing and inspecting involved significant cost; from production reports, she also knew that the rework activity involved significant cust. If the ABC and unit-based cost assignments did not ciffer by breaking out these three major activities, then ABC may not matter Pursuant to the request, Jacob produced the following cost and driver information: Activity Expected Cost Driver Activity Capacity Other activities $2,000,000 Direct laber dollars $1,250,000 Moving materials Number of moves 16,000 900,000 720,000 Inspecting Inspection hours 24,000 Reworking 380,000 Rework hours 3,800 Total averhead cost $4,000,000 Expected activity demands: Regular Model Deluxe Model Units completed 100.000 40,000 Direct labor dollars 5975,000 $375,000 Number of moves 7,200 10,900 6,000 18,000 Inspection hours Rework hours 1,500 1,900 Denumired 2. Prepare an income statement for the Cable Service Division for March. . Cable Service Division Income Statement For the Month of March Sales revenue 58,600,000 Cost of services sold 35,630,000 Gross margin 22,970,000 Less: Operating expenses 15,270,000 Income before income taxes 7,700,000 Feedback Check My Work 2. Prepare in good form subtracting operating expenses from gross margin to equal income before income taxes for the Income Statement for the Cable Service Division. of goods sold. Subtract selling expenses from gross margin to calculate income before income taxes. In calculating the Statement of Cost of Goods Manufactured for the Pl ending work in process inventory. Be sure to include all overhead costs. Prepare an income statement for the Phone Division for March. 1,170,000 Phone Division Income Statement For the Month of March Sales Cost of goods sold: Beginning finished goods inventory Add: Cost of goods manufactured 480,000 832,000 $ Goods available for sale Less: Ending finished goods inventory 375,000 937,000 Gross margin Less: Selling expenses 170,000 Income before income taxes For the income statement associated with the Phone Division, include a supporting cost of goods manufactured statement. Phone Division Statement of Cost of Goods Manufactured For the Month of March Direct materials: Beginning inventory 23,000 Add: Purchases 312,000 Materials available 335,000 Less: Ending inventory 40,000 Direct materials used 295,000 Direct labor 117,000 Overhead: Plant and equipment depreciation Materials handling Inspections Scheduling Power Plant supervision Manufacturing engineering Supplies Rework 335,000 747,000 Total manufacturing costs added: Add: Beginning work in process 130,000 Less: Ending work in process 375,000 X Cost of goods manufactured blank 832,000 Feedback CableTech Bell Corporation (CTB) operates in the telecommunications industry. CTB has two divisions: the Phone Division and the Cable Service Division. The Phone Division manufactures to ophones in several plants located in the Midwest. The product lines run from relatively inexpensive touch-tone wall and desk phones to expensive, high-quality cellular phones. CTe also operates a cable TV service in Ohio. The Cable Service Division offers three products: a basic package with 25 channels, an enhanced package, which is the basic package plus 35 additional channels and two movie channels; and a premium package, which is the basic package plus 55 additional channels and six movic channels. The Cable Service Division reported the following activity for the month of March: Basic Enhanced Premium Sales (unit) 50,000 500,000 300,000 Price per unit $32 $60 $90 unit costs: Directly traced $6 $18 $36 Driver traced $4 $8 $12 Allocated $20 $26 $30 The unit costs are divided as follows: 70 percent production and 30 percent marketing and customer service. Direct labor cost is the only driver used for tracing. Typically, the division uses only production costs to define unit costs. The preceding unit product cost information was provided at the request of the marketing manager and was the result of a special study, Bryce Youngers, the president of CTB, is reasonably satisfied with the performance of the Cable Service Division. March's performance is fairly typical of what has been happening over the past two years. The Phone Division, however, is another matter. Its overall profit performance has been declining. Two years ago, income before income taxes had been about 25 percent of sales. March's dismal performance was also typical for what has been happening this year and is expected to continue- unless some action by management is taken to reverse the trend. During March, the Phone Division reported the following results: Inventories: $23,000 Materials, March 1 Materials, March 31 40,000 Work in process, March 1 130,000 Work in process, March 31 45,000 Finished quods, March 1 Finished goods, March 31 480,000 375,000 Costs: Direct labor $117.000 Plant and equipment depreciation 50,000 65,000 Materials handling Inspections 60,000 30,000 Scheduling Power 30,000 Plant supervision 12,000 21,000 Manufacturing engineering Sales commissions 120,000 Salary, sales supervisor 10,000 Supplies 17,000 Warranty work 40,000 Rework 30,000 Puring March, the Phone Division purchased materials totaling $312,000. There are no significant inventories of supplies (beginning or ending). Supplies are accounted for separately from materials. CTB's Phone Division had sales totaling $1,170,000 for March Based on March's results, Bryce decided to meet with three of the Phone Division's managers: Kim Bresshears, divisional manager; Jacob Carder, divisional controller; and Larry Hartley, sales manager. A transcript of their recorded conversation is given next: Bryce: "March's profit performance is down once again, and I think we need to see if we can identify the problems and correct it before it's too late. Kim, what's your assessment of the situation?" Kim: "Foreign competition is eating us alive-selling phones at a lower price and high quality. If we could lower our prices by 10 to 15 percent, I think that we'd regain most of our lost market share. But we also need to make sure that the quality of our products meets that of our competitors. We are spending a lot of money each month inspection, rework, and warranties. like to see these costs cut by at least 50 percent. If we could do that by improving quality, then customers would be more satisfied with our products, and we would not only regain our Farket share but increase it' Larry: 'They're right. If we could lower our prices by 10 to 15 percent, I think that we'd regain most of our lost market share. But we also need to make sure that the quality of our products meets that of our competitors. As you know, we are spending a lot of money each month on rework and warranties. That worries me. I'd like to see that warranty cost cut by 70 to 30 percent. If we could do that, then customers would be more satisfied with our products, and I bet that we would not only regain our market share but increase it." Jacob: Lowering prices without lowering per-unit costs will not help us increase our profitability. I think we need to improve our cost accounting systern. I am not confident that we really know how much each of our product lines is costing us. It may be that we are overpricing some of our units because we are overcasting them. We may be underpricing other units." Larry: "This sounds promising-especially if the overcosting is for some of our high-volume lines. A price decrease for these products would make the biggest difference and if we knew they were ever-costed, then we could offer immediate price reductions." Bryce Jacob, I need more explanation. We have been using the same cost accounting system for the last 10 years. Why would it be a problem?" bacob: "I think that our manufacturing environment has changed. Over the years, we have added a lot of different product lines. Some of these products make very different demands on our manufacturing overhead resources. We trece-or attempt to trace-overhead costs to the sirferent products using direct labor cost, a unit-based cost driver. We may be doing more allocation than tracing. If so, then we probably don't have a very good idea of our actual product costs. Ako, as you know, with the way computer technology has changed over time, it is easier and cheaper ta collect and use detailed information - Information that will allow us to assign costs more accurately. Bryce: "This may be something we should explore. Jacob, what do you suggest7 bacob: "If we want more accurate product costs and if we really want to get in the cost reduction business, then we need to understand how costs beheve. In particular, we need to understand activity cost behavior. Knowing what activities we perform, why we perform them, and how well we perform them will help us identify areas for improvement. We also need to know how the different products consume activity resources. What this boils down to is the need to use an activity-based management system. But before we jump into this, we need some idea of whether non- unit-based drivers add anything. Activity based management is not an inexpensive undertaking. So I suggest that we do a preliminary study to see if direct labor cost is adequate for tracing. If not, then maybe some non-unit-crivers might be needed. In fact, if you would like I can gather some data that will provide some evidence on the usefulness of the activity-based approach." Bryce: "What do you think, Kim? It's your division." kim: "What Jacob has said sounds promising. I think he should pursue it and do so quickly. I also think that we need to look at improving our quality. It sounds like we have a problem there. If quality could be improved, then our costs will drop. I'll talk to our quality people. Jacob, in the meantime, find out for us if moving to an activity-based system is the way to go. How much time do you need?" bacob: "I have already been gathering data. I could probably have a report within two weeks MEMO TO: Kim Bashaars Jacob Carder FROM: SUBJECT: Preliminary Analysis Based on my initial analysis, I am confident that an ABC system will offer significant improvement. For one of our conventional phone plants, I regressed total monthly overheed cost on monthly direct labor cost using the following 15 months of data: Based on my initial analysis, I am confident that an ABC system will offer significant improvement. For one of our conventional phone plants, Tregressed total monthly overhead cost on monthly direct labor cast using the following 15 months of data: Overhead Direct Labor Cost $360,000 $110,000 100,000 300,000 350,000 90.000 100,000 100,000 320,000 380,000 90.000 100,000 300,000 280,000 340,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 410,000 115,000 375,000 100,000 85,000 360,000 340,000 85,000 330,000 90,000 300,000 80,000 The results were revealing. Although direct labor cost appears to be a driver of overhead cost, it really doesn't explain a lot of the variation. I then searched for other drivers-particularly non-unit drivers-that might offer more insight into overhead cost behavior. Every time a batch is produced, material movement cours, regardless of the size of the batch. The number of moves seemed like a more logical driver. I was able to gather only 10 months of data for this. (Our information system doesn't provide the number of moves, so I had to build the data set by interviewing production personnel.) This information is provided next: Materials-Handling Cost Number of Moves $80,000 1,500 60,000 1,000 1,250 70,000 72,000 65,000 1,300 1,100 1,700 85,000 67,000 1,200 73,500 1,350 1,400 83,000 84,000 1,700 99,000 1,700 The regression results were impressive. There is no question in my mind that the number of moves is a good driver of materials-harding costs. Using the number of moves to assign materials-handling costs to products would likely be better than the cost assignment using direct labor cast. Furthermore, since small batches use the same number of moves as large batches, we have some evidence that we may be overcosting our high volume products. Kim, you expressed the desire of reducing the costs of inspection, rewarking, and warranties. In addition to the pilot study for one plant, i also collected information about these three activities for the division. For the inspection activity, we have 15 inspectors wha are paid an average of $4,000 per month. Each inspector offers a practical Inspection capacity of 2,000 hours per year. However, it appears that inspectors actually work only about 80 percent of those hours. Rework cost is simply the cost of repiscing some faulty components and the associated direct labor. The rework cost per unit is predictable and constant per unit regardless of the product model. Warranty cust, on the other hand, involves the salaries of two technicians, with the remaining cost, the cost of replacement components, which is relatively constant per unit repaired. The technicians are paid $5,000 per month and pravide 2,000 hours of service per year. Warranty service usually requires 3.600 technician hours per year. After receiving the memo, Kim was intrigued, both by the activity-based costing pilot study and by the potential savings for the division by improving quality. She then asked Jacob to use the same phone plant as a pilot for a preliminary AAC analysis. She instructed him to assign al overhead costs to the plant's two products (Regular and Deluxe models), using only four activities. The four activities were rework, maving materials, inspecting products, and a general catch-all activity labeled "other manufacturing activities. From the special study already performed, she knew that materials handing and inspecting involved significant cost; from production reports, she also knew that the rework activity involved significant cust. If the ABC and unit-based cost assignments did not ciffer by breaking out these three major activities, then ABC may not matter Pursuant to the request, Jacob produced the following cost and driver information: Activity Expected Cost Driver Activity Capacity Other activities $2,000,000 Direct laber dollars $1,250,000 Moving materials Number of moves 16,000 900,000 720,000 Inspecting Inspection hours 24,000 Reworking 380,000 Rework hours 3,800 Total averhead cost $4,000,000 Expected activity demands: Regular Model Deluxe Model Units completed 100.000 40,000 Direct labor dollars 5975,000 $375,000 Number of moves 7,200 10,900 6,000 18,000 Inspection hours Rework hours 1,500 1,900 Denumired 2. Prepare an income statement for the Cable Service Division for March. . Cable Service Division Income Statement For the Month of March Sales revenue 58,600,000 Cost of services sold 35,630,000 Gross margin 22,970,000 Less: Operating expenses 15,270,000 Income before income taxes 7,700,000 Feedback Check My Work 2. Prepare in good form subtracting operating expenses from gross margin to equal income before income taxes for the Income Statement for the Cable Service Division. of goods sold. Subtract selling expenses from gross margin to calculate income before income taxes. In calculating the Statement of Cost of Goods Manufactured for the Pl ending work in process inventory. Be sure to include all overhead costs. Prepare an income statement for the Phone Division for March. 1,170,000 Phone Division Income Statement For the Month of March Sales Cost of goods sold: Beginning finished goods inventory Add: Cost of goods manufactured 480,000 832,000 $ Goods available for sale Less: Ending finished goods inventory 375,000 937,000 Gross margin Less: Selling expenses 170,000 Income before income taxes For the income statement associated with the Phone Division, include a supporting cost of goods manufactured statement. Phone Division Statement of Cost of Goods Manufactured For the Month of March Direct materials: Beginning inventory 23,000 Add: Purchases 312,000 Materials available 335,000 Less: Ending inventory 40,000 Direct materials used 295,000 Direct labor 117,000 Overhead: Plant and equipment depreciation Materials handling Inspections Scheduling Power Plant supervision Manufacturing engineering Supplies Rework 335,000 747,000 Total manufacturing costs added: Add: Beginning work in process 130,000 Less: Ending work in process 375,000 X Cost of goods manufactured blank 832,000 Feedback

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Students also viewed these Accounting questions