Lewis and Stark is a public accounting firm that offers two primary services, auditing and tax-return preparation. A controversy has developed between the partners of the two service lines as to who is contributing the greater amount to the bottom line. The area of contention is the assignment of overhead. The tax partners argue for assigning overhead on the basis of 40% of direct labor dollars, while the audit partners argue for implementing activity-based costing. The partners agree to use next year's budgeted data for purposes of analysis and comparison. The following overhead data are collected to develop the comparison Estimated Use of Cost Drivers per Service Activity Cost Pools Employee training Typing and secretarial Computing Facility rental Travel Cost Drivers Direct labor dollars Number of reports/forms Number of minutes Number of employees Per expense reports Estimated Overhead $202,400 76,400 232,200 144,000 81.000 $736,000 Estimated Use of Cost Drivers $1,840,000 2,500 60,000 Audit $1.191.000 800 27.000 22 56,000 Tax $649.000 1,700 33,000 18 25,300 40 Direct (a) Using traditional product costing as proposed by the tax partners, compute the total overhead cost assigned to both services Caudit and tax of Lewis and Stark. Audit Tax (a) Using traditional product costing as proposed by the tax partners, compute the total overhead cost assigned to both services (audit and tax) of Lewis and Stark Audit Tax Total overhead cost assigned $ e Textbook and Media Save for Later Attemnts of Surad