Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
LGBTQ+ Reflection Assignment Consider ALL of the following cases. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins - Decided 1989 Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. - 2006 Masterpiece Cake
LGBTQ+ Reflection Assignment
Consider ALL of the following cases.
- Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins - Decided 1989
- Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. - 2006
- Masterpiece Cake v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission - Decided 2018
- R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes - Decided 2020
- Bostock v. Clayton County Georgia - Decided 2020
- Executive Order on Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation - 2021
- Also consider the Strict Scrutiny Test --> Compelling state interest, directly advances that interest goes no further than necessary (narrowly tailored)
Questions to Consider for Reflection Assignment
1. Do you see any similarities and/or differences between LGBTQ+ civil rights movements/activities and the civil rights movements/activities of other groups?
2. As a business, what are the consequences of:
- Public statements of inclusivity
- Inclusive corporate policies and benefits
- No inclusive public statements, policies, benefits
- Statements against inclusivity
Rubric
- Identifies similarities and/or differences between LGBTQ+ civil rights movements/activities and the civil rights movements/activities of other groups.
- Identifies the consequences of inclusive public statements.
- Identifies the consequences of inclusive corporate policies and benefits.
- Identifies the consequences of statements against inclusivity.
- Identifies the consequences of no inclusive public statements, policies, benefits.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started