LMA.BM.BUSN115.MAY19

LMA.BM.BUSN115.MAY19

Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOMMUNICATION 36.0 to >33.0 pts Excellent The presentation is visually stimulating with no grammar or spelling errors. Writing quality is excellent clear, organized and professional. The presentation is well rehearsed and presented in no more than 10 slides in allotted time. It is clear the substance is well understood and covers all items. Q&A are handled well. 33.0 to >30.0 pts Competent The presentation is visually stimulating with some grammar or spelling errors. Writing quality is good clear, organized and professional. The presentation is well rehearsed and presented in no more than 10 slides in allotted time. It is clear the substance is somewhatl understood and covers all items. Q&A are handled well. 30.0 to >27.0 pts Fair The presentation had some visual appeal with many grammar or spelling errors. Writing quality is limited. The presentation does not seem well rehearsed and presented in no more than 10 slides in allotted time. It is clear the substance is not understood and covers all items. Q&A is not handled well. 27.0 to >24.0 pts Poor The presentation has no visual appeal with many grammar or spelling errors. Writing quality is poor. The presentation does not seem well rehearsed and presented in no more than 10 slides in allotted time. It is clear the substance is not understood and covers all items. Q&A is not handled well. 24.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student did not meet this competency 36.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115.Communication view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student PowerPoint effectively communicates the overview of the chosen company and why the selected management theory is the most appropriate to address each of the company goals. 3.0 pts Competent: Student PowerPoint somewhat communicates the overview of the chosen company and why the selected management theory is the most appropriate to address each of the company goals. 2.0 pts Fair: Student PowerPoint vaguely communicates the overview of the chosen company and why the selected management theory is the most appropriate to address each of the company goals. 1.0 pts Poor: Student PowerPoint poorly communicates the overview of the chosen company and why the selected management theory is the most appropriate to address each of the company goals. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLEADERSHIP 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent This student has an excellent understanding and application of leadership theory expressed through the presentation. 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent This student has good understanding and application of leadership theory expressed through the presentation. 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair This student has a limited understanding and application of leadership theory expressed through the presentation. 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor This student has a poor understanding and application of leadership theory expressed through the presentation. 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The student does not meet this competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115.Leadership view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student appropriately applies leadership theory from text in effort to meet the company goals as listed in the assignment. 3.0 pts Competent: Student applies some leadership theory from text in effort to meet the company goals as listed in the assignment. 2.0 pts Fair: Student vaguely applies leadership theory from text in effort to meet the company goals as listed in the assignment. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly applied leadership theory from text in effort to meet the company goals as listed in the assignment. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeETHICS AND VALUE 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Ethics were strongly considered and presented the social conscience aspects of the company. 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent Ethics were somewhat considered and presented the social conscience aspects of the company. 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair Ethics had a limited consideration and presented some of the social conscience aspects of the company. 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor Ethics were poorly considered and did not present the social conscience aspects of the company. 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student did not meet this competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115.Ethics and Values view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters the adherence of organizational values, ethics, and professional responsibility. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters the adherence of organizational values, ethics, and professional responsibility. 2.0 pts Fair: Student vaguely demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters the adherence of organizational values, ethics, and professional responsibility. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters the adherence of organizational values, ethics, and professional responsibility. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRESEARCH 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Presentation included information supported by research, facts, and figures, not generalizations and clearly shows the appropriate use and application of research 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent Presentation included information supported by some research, facts, and figures, with some generalizations and shows the appropriate use and application of research 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair Presentation included information supported by limited research, facts, and figures, with some generalizations and shows limited appropriate use and application of research 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor Presentation included information poorly supported by research, facts, and figures, with mostly generalizations and shows poor appropriate use and application of research 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable The student did not meet this competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115.Reseasrch view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates understanding of selected management theories that go beyond "common knowledge" and show evidence of research and evaluation concerning theories. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates understanding of selected management theories that go beyond "common knowledge" and show evidence of research and evaluation concerning theories. 2.0 pts Fair: Student vaguely demonstrates understanding of selected management theories that go beyond "common knowledge" and show evidence of research and evaluation concerning theories. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates understanding of selected management theories that go beyond "common knowledge" and show evidence of research and evaluation concerning theories. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115.Decision Making view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters problem solving skills in the workforce. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters problem solving skills in the workforce. 2.0 pts Fair: Student has a limited demonstration of how selected leadership theory fosters problem solving skills in the workforce. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters problem solving skills in the workforce. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDECISION MAKING 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Presentation utilizes industry-appropriate tools and techniques that identify leadership theories in regards to making decisions 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent Presentation utilizes some industry-appropriate tools and techniques that identify leadership theories in regards to making decisions 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair Presentation utilizes limited industry-appropriate tools and techniques that identify leadership theories in regards to making decisions 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor Presentation utilizes poor industry-appropriate tools and techniques that identify leadership theories in regards to making decisions 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student did not meet competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115. Global Environment view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters appreciation of diversity and value in a global workforce. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters appreciation of diversity and value in a global workforce. 2.0 pts Fair: Student has limited demonstration of how selected leadership theory fosters appreciation of diversity and value in a global workforce. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters appreciation of diversity and value in a global workforce. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGLOBAL ENVIRONMENT 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent The student shows excellent management and leadership skills and solid understanding of business and workforce challenges and opportunities in a globalized business environment 14.0 to >13.0 pts Excellent The student shows some management and leadership skills and solid understanding of business and workforce challenges and opportunities in a globalized business environment 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair The student shows limited management and leadership skills and solid understanding of business and workforce challenges and opportunities in a globalized business environment 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor The student shows poor management and leadership skills and solid understanding of business and workforce challenges and opportunities in a globalized business environment 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student does not meet this competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115. Quality Improvement view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters improving quality of a product or service. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters improving quality of a product or service. 2.0 pts Fair: Student has limited demonstration on how selected leadership theory fosters improving quality of a product or service. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters improving quality of a product or service. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQUALITY IMPROVEMENT 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent The student demonstrates an excellent understanding of various issues affecting organizational quality 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent The student demonstrates some understanding of various issues affecting organizational quality 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair The student demonstrates a limited understanding of various issues affecting organizational quality 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor The student demonstrates a poor understanding of various issues affecting organizational quality 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student did not meet this competency 16.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBM.UGB.BUSN115. Collaboration view longer description threshold: 3.0 pts 4.0 pts Excellent: Student clearly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters employee collaboration. 3.0 pts Competent: Student somewhat demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters employee collaboration. 2.0 pts Fair: Student has limited demonstration of how selected leadership theory fosters employee collaboration. 1.0 pts Poor: Student poorly demonstrates how selected leadership theory fosters employee collaboration. 0.0 pts Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency. 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCOLLABORATION 16.0 to >14.0 pts Excellent Presentation strongly demonstrates managerial support and engagement of employee collaboration 14.0 to >13.0 pts Competent Presentation somewhat demonstrates managerial support and engagement of employee collaboration 13.0 to >11.0 pts Fair Presentation demonstrates limited managerial support and engagement of employee collaboration 11.0 to >10.0 pts Poor Presentation poorly demonstrates managerial support and engagement of employee collaboration 10.0 to >0 pts Unacceptable Student did not meet this competency 16.0 pts Total Points: 180.0