LMJ Farms enters into a contract to supply tomatoes to Unico Foods for its line of tomato sauce. Since it is a new relationship, both parties want the option to end the contract without problems, so they include a clause that allows either one of them to terminate the contract on 30 days written notice. LMJ finds that Unico is slow in paying its bills. At the beginning of the next month, LMJ gives notice to Unico in writing that the contract will end at the end of the month. Unico insists that the 30 days notice clause means 30 working days, not 30 calendar days, and thus LMJ must supply them until 30 working days expires. LMJ refuses and as a result Unico loses two weeks of production when its supply of tomatoes runs out and Unico sues LMJ for breach of contract. In this situation, Multiple Choice This is a mistake of law, specifically the law of contract. This is a mistake about the existence of the subject-matter of the contract. This is a case of innocent misrepresentation. This is an example of a mistake of utmost good faith. Multiple Choice This is a mistake of law, specifically the law of contract. This is a mistake about the existence of the subject-matter of the contract. This is a case of innocent misrepresentation. This is an example of a mistake of utmost good faith. This is a mistake of fact