Long Answer Option 2 Consent and Sexual Assault Scenario When attending a costume party at a local bar, the accused (Kevin) groped the complainant multiple times Despite the fact that the complainant said a clear No to every sexual advance Kevin made, he eventually rubbed his erect penis against her on the dance floor The complainant reported the sexual assault to police that night, with others on record having witnessed the exchange In defence of his actions, Kevin asserted the following points The complainant was wearing a sexually revealing costume and she did not leave at any point, meaning that there was implied consent for him to proceed Kevin's girlfriend was attending the same costume party and wearing the same costume as the complainant The costumes had a mask portion which mostly obscured the wearer's identity, so he believed the complainant was his girlfriend Kevin's girlfriend had told him earlier that night that she might play hard to get, but wanted him to pursue her Kevin stated that she had therefore consented in advance to anything he would do Question to answer Based on what you have learned in this class, do you think Kevin's three defences should lead to him being acquitted or convicted Why Although your answer still needs to pick either acquittal or conviction, it can note how some defences support this more than others (e g , Although one of these defences could support an acquittal, Kevin's defences still mostly support a conviction because of or Kevin's defences mostly support an acquittal, with the exception of ) To evaluate Kevin's defences, be sure to use what you have learned in Unit 3 about Canadian law's approach to consent, its definition of sexual assault, possible defences, and or the relationship of these factors to major cases we have studied

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

Answered step by step

Verified Expert Solution

Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 21, 2024

Long Answer Option #2 Consent and Sexual Assault Scenario: When attending a costume party at a local bar, the accused (Kevin) groped the complainant multiple

Long Answer Option #2

Consent and Sexual Assault

Scenario: When attending a costume party at a local bar, the accused (Kevin) groped the complainant multiple times. Despite the fact that the complainant said a clear "No" to every sexual advance Kevin made, he eventually rubbed his erect penis against her on the dance floor. The complainant reported the sexual assault to police that night, with others on record having witnessed the exchange.

In defence of his actions, Kevin asserted the following points:

The complainant was wearing a sexually revealing costume and she did not leave at any point, meaning that there was "implied consent" for him to proceed.
Kevin's girlfriend was attending the same costume party and wearing the same costume as the complainant. The costumes had a mask portion which mostly obscured the wearer's identity, so he believed the complainant was his girlfriend.
Kevin's girlfriend had told him earlier that night that she might "play hard to get," but wanted him to pursue her. Kevin stated that she had therefore consented "in advance" to anything he would do.

Question to answer: Based on what you have learned in this class, do you think Kevin's three defences should lead to him being acquitted or convicted? Why?

Although your answer still needs to pick either "acquittal" or "conviction," it can note how some defences support this more than others (e.g., "Although one of these defences could support an acquittal, Kevin's defences stillmostlysupport a conviction because of..." or "Kevin's defencesmostly support an acquittal, with the exception of..."). To evaluate Kevin's defences, be sure to use what you have learned inUnit 3 about Canadian law's approach to consent, its definition of sexual assault, possible defences, and/or the relationship of these factors to major cases we have studied.