Look back at the Pauline$/$Carlos hypo. Add to the facts that Pauline's order would've exceeded $$500.$

Is there another UCC exception $($aside from Course of Dealing$)$ that might allow Carlos to prevail against Pauline's breach of contract suit if he were able to come up with $15$ more pairs of the right shoes?

A$.$

Offer and Acceptance: Because Pauline did not make a clear, unequivocal acceptance of the type of shoe offered for sale by Carlos

B$.$

The Mirror Image Rule: Because the UCC completely does away with the Mirror Image Rule

C$.$

Object of the Contract: Because the UCC excpetion would allow Carlos to remedy his mistake

D$.$

Statute of Frauds: Because only Pauline signed the contract and Carlos therefore can't be sued