Look closely at the following image of a frame from a 1986 Pixar film (Luxo Jr. original short film). Remember, Pixar's parent company is Disney, and Luxo is a Norwegian lamp company. Do a bit of research. Find information about the lawsuit Luxo brought against Pixar/Disney. Then determine which answer is true.

A. One fact relevant to the case was that Luxo had initially alerted Pixar to the potential illegality associated with using their name and images of their products.

B. One fact relevant to the case is that Pixar believed they were using content that was transformative and already part of the common marketplace of ideas.

C. One fact relevant to the case is that Luxo's products were already highly successful, distinctive, and available in the United States.

D. One fact relevant to the case is that Pixar's founder, John Lasseter, had publicly stated that he was inspired to create his animation by the Luxo lamp on his desk and that he considered the lamp to be part of Pixar's logo.