Question
Lucy v. Zehmer 1. Why does the court require objective intention to contract? The contrasting term to objective is subjective, meaning peculiar to a particular
Lucy v. Zehmer
1. Why does the court require objective intention to contract? The contrasting term to objective is subjective, meaning "peculiar to a particular individual." Why isn't subjective intent preferable; after all, if you want to know what someone means, can't you ask them?
2. Can you identify three separate contentions Zehmer makes to defend against Lucy's action? Why were they unsuccessful? Do you agree with the court's ruling?
3. Lucy testified that there had been an oral agreement to buy the farm for $20,000 "seven or eight years ago." Why do you suppose Lucy had not sued to enforce that agreement?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started