Macro cost/benefit analysis

The Social Security system is a pay as you go retirement plan. Money taken from workers' checks is transferred to retirees. At one time there were 42 workers per retiree; today the ratio is now under 3 to 1. By 2030, the ratio is expected to fall to 2 to 1. The only way to keep the current system solvent is to raise taxes on those currently working or cut benefits to those already retired. Neither of these options is particularly pleasant. Another option has been debated for years, privatization. Under this plan, the government would still deduct money from our checks, but it would be put into personal retirement accounts under our own individual (but limited) control.

Carefully read the information below, and then do one thing with the data.

(1) Prioritize the list, from most important to least important. do all seven listed

Costs :

1. Many people close to retirement could be harmed by a sudden drop in the market, reducing the value of their retirement accounts just when they need it the most.

2. Any privatization plan would have much higher administrative costs than our current transfer program, reducing the potential returns.

3. Disabled workers and widows of workers who die young would see a reduction in benefits.

4. Social Security is indexed to protect against inflation (there is a COLA tied to the CPI), private retirement accounts would not be able to guarantee this protection.

5. If we try to privatize, the only way to continue to pay for today's retiree's benefits and put money into separate accounts for each individual would be to raise taxes or cut benefits or both (at least in the short run).

6. Privatization may lead to a loss of "community", the idea that we are all in the same retirement plan together.

7. Some people are concerned that many people are totally unprepared to choose the investment strategy best suited to their individual needs. This could lead to people making bad choices and having less retirement income.