Make this not look like it was written by ChatGPT ntersectionality and the Justice System's Bias (Rubino et al., 2021): The Rubino et al. (2021) study underscores the critical issue of intersectionality within the juvenile justice system, revealing how biases related to gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation significantly influence court responses to youth. The research demonstrates that juvenile practitioner biases not only affect the perception and treatment of youth but also highlight the systemic discrimination faced by marginalized groups. This finding is crucial as it calls for a reevaluation of the justice system's approach to dealing with youth, urging the integration of intersectionality into policies and practices to ensure fair and equitable treatment of all individuals. The emphasis on understanding the layered identities of court-involved girls and the call for action to address root causes of system involvement stand out as a pivotal step towards reforming juvenile justice practices.

Disproportionate Impact and Needs of LGBT Youth in the System (Holsinger & Hodge, 2016): Holsinger & Hodge (2016) provide insight into the disproportionate representation of LGBT youth in the juvenile justice system and their unique needs, which are often unmet due to systemic ignorance and bias. The study highlights the severe lack of attention paid to the experiences of LGBT youth in the system, the absence of targeted support and interventions, and the pervasive discrimination they face from both peers and staff within the system. This finding is significant as it sheds light on the critical gaps within juvenile justice practices concerning LGBT youth, emphasizing the urgent need for inclusive, supportive measures that address their specific needs and protect them from further abuse and discrimination.

Practitioners' Perceptions and the Disconnect in Response (Rubino et al., 2021): The research by Rubino et al. (2021) also revealed a disconnect between juvenile practitioners' understanding of the pathways leading girls into the system and their responses to these girls. Despite recognizing trauma and relational issues as significant factors contributing to girls' delinquency, the practitioners' interventions often do not reflect this understanding, highlighting a gap between theory and practice. This finding is noteworthy as it points to the necessity of integrating trauma-informed and gender-responsive approaches into the juvenile justice system's operations, ensuring that interventions are effectively aligned with the needs of court-involved girls, including those from marginalized communities.