Managing a Merger at Lightning Networks After receiving regulatory approval from the European Union, Lightning Networks, a major wireless carrier, and SatTV, the largest satellite TV provider in Europe, completed their 50 billion euro merger in 2016. After initial skepticism when the deal was first announced, analysts had warmed to the idea of synergies in the merger. Lightning expected to benefit from the large customer base of SatTV, and the company announced that it expected significant annual cost savings within three years of the merger. Simone Durand, senior VP of supply chain at Lightning, was charged with identifying some cost reduction opportunities. She decided to focus her initial attention on the distribution networks the two companies used to fulfill the demand for installation and repair products. The merger offered an opportunity to combine the two distribution networks. The Current Distribution Network Any new installation or repair by Lightning or SatTV required a set of products for the technician to complete the job. Rather than carrying these products with technicians, both companies had decided to centralize product inventories in a few locations. Annual product demand for the two companies across six regions in Europe was as shown in Table 1. Lightning had served its product needs from three warehouses located in Madrid, Spain; Rotterdam, Netherlands; and Krakow, Poland. SatTV had served its product needs from three warehouses located in Toulouse, France; Munich, Germany; and Budapest, Hungary. Each facility was specialized to handle either wireless or satellite products because of the historical focus of the company it belonged to. The specialization, capacity, and annual fixed cost for each facility were as shown in Table 2. The capacity of each warehouse is given in terms of how much annual demand it can handle. From Table 2, observe that the Madrid warehouse can serve a demand of up to 370,000 units. The variable cost of shipping one unit (either wireless or satellite) from each warehouse location to each market is shown in Table 3. The Network Options Simone had a short-term and a long-term decision to make. In the short term, she had to decide whether to make all the warehouses flexible or not. Making all warehouses flexible required an investment equivalent to an additional annual cost of 200,000 euros. Flexible warehouses, however, could be used to serve the demand for both wireless and satellite products. In the longer term, Simone had to decide whether to restructure the distribution network. She could choose to close some warehouses, leave others open as they were, or double the capacity of some warehouses. Doubling the capacity of a warehouse would increase its annual fixed cost by 80%. Thus, if the capacity of the Madrid warehouse was doubled, its annual fixed cost would be 1,080,000 euros. Closing a warehouse would also incur some cost, thus reducing the annual fixed cost that could be saved. Simones team estimated that closing a warehouse would save 80% of the annual fixed cost. Therefore, closing the Madrid warehouse would still result in an annual cost of 120,000 euros because only 80% of the fixed cost is saved. Questions 1- What is the annual cost if Lightning uses the current network (with warehouses specialized as in Table 2) optimally to meet European demand? (10 points) 2- Should Simone make all warehouses flexible, given the additional cost of 200,000 euros per year? (10 points) 3- What supply chain network configuration do you recommend for the long term if demand is as in Table 1? Should any warehouses be closed? Should any warehouses see their capacity doubled? (20 points) Table 1 Annual Demand in Europe for Lightning Networks (wireless) and SatTV (satellite) Zone Wireless Demand Satellite Demand Zone Wireless Demand Satellite Demand Northwest 200,000 120,000 Middle South 120,000 120,000 Southwest 100,000 100,000 Northeast 150,000 110,000 Middle North 220,000 100,000 Southeast 90,000 100,000 Table 2 Warehouse Specialization, Capacities, and Fixed Costs Location Specialization Capacity Fixed Cost (euro/year) Madrid Wireless 370,000 600,000 Rotterdam Wireless 420,000 650,000 Krakow Wireless 310,000 520,000 Toulouse Satellite 280,000 475,000 Munich Satellite 290,000 488,000 Budapest Satellite 250,000 425,000 Table 3 Variable Distribution Cost per Unit in Euro Northwest Southwest Middle North Middle South Northeast Southeast Madrid 2.50 1.50 3.00 2.75 4.00 4.50 Rotterdam 1.75 3.00 1.50 3.00 2.50 3.50 Krakow 3.25 4.00 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.50 Toulouse 2.00 2.00 2.75 2.50 3.75 4.00 Munich 2.25 3.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 Budapest 3.50 3.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.00