Manik has always been an upstanding citizen. A man came in to Manik's used electronics store and offered to sell him flat-screen TVs at an extremely low price. Manik did not question the low sales price. When Manik paid the man for the goods, he discovered that the man was an undercover police officer, who charged Manik with purchasing stolen goods. Can Manik argue that the charge was entrapment? Why or why not?