Question
Many animals respond to fire by seeking cover, and most of the time they are likely responding to either visual cues (sight of flames), thermal
Many animals respond to fire by seeking cover, and most of the time they are likely responding to either visual cues (sight of flames), thermal cues (heat), or chemical cues (smoke). Grafe et al. (2002) wanted to see if auditory cues (the sound of the fire) might also lead to a change in behavior. They studied juvenile reed frogs (Hyperolius nitidulus) in specialized arenas, and recorded their response to one of three sounds: (1) a recording of a fire moving through the forest floor (Fire); (2) this same sound, but played backward (Reverse Fire); (3) white noise (a constant hum), which served as a control (White Noise). For each frog, they recorded whether it moved away from the sound or not; the latter category included no movement or movement toward the sound. The data for each frog is given below:
Type of Sound | Direction | Type of Sound | Direction | Type of Sound | Direction |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | not away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
Fire | not away | Reverse Fire | not away | White Noise | not away |
1. Use these data to set up a contingency table. Then use either a G-test or a chi-square test of independence to analyze this contingency table. You must provide your row and column totals and the expected values for each cell in the table.
2. From these data, does it look like either one or both of the factors (type of sound or frog response) was fixed by the researchers? Be sure to explain your reasoning
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started