Margaret operates a large business based In a Central American country, which sells automobile tires. Margaret moved to Central America from Canada to start her venture but has AEtalned her Canadian citizenship. After five years of successful sales, her Canadlan supplier ceased sending her tires. She contacted the supplier to find out its reason for discontinuing the sales. The company replied that because Canada was party to a U$.$N$.$ sanctloned trade embargo agalnst thls country, she had been deemed an enemy allen by the government of Canada. The supplier company had, on that basis, decided to break the supply contract. Margaret was desperate to malntaln supplies and threatened legal action for the broken contract. Would she be successful?

Multiple Choice

A and $D.$

Scrambling: Locked

No$,$ because the "enemy alien" status results from the Implementation of the "War Measures Act" which makes all contracts abroad null and vold.

Yes, because this may not be a valid declaration of an "enemy allen" as Canada is not at war and there are no grounds for a breach.

Yes. because her "enemy allen" status does not provide grounds for the breach of contract that has hapoened