Marketing Related Problem #3 INTENSIVE VERSUS SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION Hydropump, Inc.. produces and sells high-quality pumps to business customers. Its marketing research shows a growing market for a similar type of pump aimed at final consumers--for use with Jacuzzi-style tubs in home remodeling jobs. Hydropump will have to develop new channels of distribution to reach this target market because most consumers rely on a retailer for advice about the combination of tub, pump, heater, and related plumbing fixtures they need. Hydropump's marketing manager, Robert Black, is trying to decide between intensive and selective distribution. With intensive distribution, he would try to sell through all the plumbing supply, bathroom fixture, and hot-tub retailers who will carry the pump. He estimates that about 5,600 suitable retailers would be willing to carry a new pump. With selective distribution, he would focus on about 280 of the best hot-tub dealers (2 or 3 in the 100 largest metropolitan areas). Intensive distribution would require Hydropump to do more mass selling-primarily advertising in home renovation magazines--to help stimulate consumer familiarity with the brand and convince retailers that Hydropump equipment will sell. The price to the retailer might have to be lower too (to permit a bigger markup) so they will be motivated to sell Hydropump rather than some other brand offering a smaller markup With intensive distribution, each Hydropump sales rep could probably handle about 300 retailers effectively. With selective distribution, each sales rep could handle only about 70 retailers because more merchandising help would be necessary. Managing the smaller sales force and fewer retailers, with the selective approach, would require less manager overhead cost. Going to all suitable and available retailers would make the pump available through about 20 times as many retailers and have the potential of reaching more customers. However, many customers shop at more than one retailer before making a final choice-so selective distribution would reach almost as many potential customers. Further, if Hydropump is using selective distribution, it would get more in- store sales attention for its pump and a larger share of pump purchases at each retailer. Black has decided to use a spreadsheet to analyze the benefits and costs of intensive versus selective distribution, PLUS-Spreadsheet Selective Intensive Number of Retailers Retailers per Sales Rep Sales Reps Needed Salary per Sales Rep Personal Selling Expense Mass-selling Expense Overhead Cost Cost to produce a Pump Total Pumps Sold by Dealers Hydropump's Percent of Dealers' Units Total Expected Units Price fo Retailers Hydropump Total Revenue Hydropump Total Cost Hydropump Profit 5600" 280* 300" 70" 19 4 18000 DO 18000.00 34200000 72000.00 200000.00 50000.00 12000000" 80000.00 35.00" 35 00 175000" 25000 12 00 40.00 21000 10400 70 000 75009 1470000.00 780000 00 1397000 DO 566000.00 73000 00 214000 00 a. Based on the initial spreadsheet, which approach seems to be the most sensible for Hydropump? Why? A selective approach seems to be most sensible considering that hydropump would achieve a higher proft, less over head cost and less to manager acrall b. A consultant points out that even selective distribution needs national promotion. If Black has to increase advertising and spend a total of $100,000 on mass selling to be able to recruit the retailers he wants for selective distribution, would selective or intensive distribution be more profitable? C. With intensive distribution, how large a share (percent) of the retailers' total unit sales would Hydropump have to capture to sell enough pumps to earn $200,000 profit