Martin, a full-time student at Springfield University, lists his iPhone for sale on Facebook MarketPlace to raise money to buy a new phone. He posts several pictures of the phone and describes it as follows: "used iPhone 6." Rick calls Martin to express his interest in buying the phone. They agree to meet up so that Rick can inspect the phone and decide whether to purchase it or not. After looking the phone over, Rick agrees to buy it from Martin. They agree on a price, Rick pays the money, and the two go their separate ways. Later that day, after Rick has charged the phone's battery and switched it to his cellular phone account, Rick grabs the phone and heads to a party with some friends. After about 20 minutes, Rick notices that the phone's battery has dropped to just 3%. Realizing that the battery on the phone does not hold a charge, Rick contacts Martin and demands that Martin return his money since the phone is worthless as far as Rick is concerned. Martin refuses and says that he has already bought a new phone, the Google Pixel. Since Rick's phone is worthless, he contacts an attorney via carrier pigeon and files suit against Martin, alleging breach of the implied warranty of merchantability. Will Rick win?Group of answer choices-Yes, because a phone is not fit for the ordinary purpose for which it is intended if the battery only lasts around 20 minutes.-No, because Rick failed to ask whether the phone's battery functioned properly.-No, because Martin is not a merchant