Marvel Entertainment would like to analyze the viewer$$s review comments of their

$2018$ film $$Venom$$ to filter strong frequent association patterns among at least $50\%$ of

viewers. They are looking for only parameters in the below list and their intent of the

analysis is to produce film under of similar genre for their next collaboration with

Tencent Pictures. Representative sample reviews used for analysis is given below:

$$ Edit $($or Editing or Edition or Scene or Visuals or Graphics$)$

$$ Expect$($or Expectation$)$

$$ Hero

$$ Villain

$$ Anti$-$Hero,

$$ Action

$$ Com$$ Plot $($or Writing or story or character$)$

S$.$No Ratings Review Comments

$11$ Sadly, the writers went down the safer road and made the well known villain into a hero.

$25$ I love the anti$-$hero take on Venom. Funny action packed liked the story line. Not for kids

but definitely recommend for a laugh

$34$ One of the best anti$-$hero character movie.Great display of acting and direction. The script

is handled very well with good visuals. Yes, the villain could have been stronger.

$43$ how venom is a super villain but now they make him a hero and the bonding scene is

really disappointing

$54$ First half goes very well in terms of setting the story and the venom universe, second part

is more about action and there it has a few flaws but it is still fun and interesting to

watch...but don't have too high expectations. Tom Hardy is in all the scene.

$65$ I like how they now thought something different from the comic storylines.. I personally

loved the story plot!!

$75$ It's has funny moments which is necessary in movies like this. Not so serious or gravel

voice like some action movies. Not so much fighting but more story which is a nice

change.

$85$ the storyline was unique and i loved the way venom had a sense of humour to him

throughout the whole movie.

$91$ The trailers were also poor editing, especially with the Wilhelm scream, so expectations

were low. I was VERY excited at the beginning when I saw they were doing a Venom

movie, but it's such a letdown. We're here for the villain$/$anti$-$hero black blob with a

superiority complex.

$103$ Tho I dont call them plot holes. And its a real shame because it could of been a good

movie.

$114$ It was entertaining, had plenty of action, and had a sprinkle on comedy at times. it was

refreshing to see a movie where the villain is technically the good guy. Venom was really

cool and the story was great

$123$ The character graph is given a heroic turnover $.$ It starts slow and never picks up the pace.

Both the lady and the villain needs more charisma $.$

$131$ Predictable plot, dialogue borrowed from a selection of scripts circa $1988.$ Receipts just

confirm there's a sizeable audience with very low expectations

$[2+3\mathrm{.}5+1\mathrm{.}5+1=8$ Marks$]$

a$.$ Convert the given data into transactional data.

b$.$ Mine only the frequent $2-$itemsets using Apriori algorithm.

c$.$ Explain Apriori pruning principle in frequent items mining by using the results obtained

from part b$)$

d$.$ As per your understanding, justify in no more than $1$ statement, why FP tree growth might

be better suited for mining frequent itemsets instead of Apriori algorithm for this problemedy$($or laugh or funny or humour$)$