Mary, a 72-year old retired teach commenced an action against Matthew, a licensed stockbroker, claiming that he had decieved her into investing her life savings by fraudulently claiming that he would greatly enrich her via a series of stock transactions. Matthew has no history of disciplinary actions or lawsuits against him with respect to transactions initiated by him. Matthew is generally known as an honest person by his friends, collegues and clients. At trial, Mathews counsel attempts to introduce evidence, via the testimony of another stockbroker who works with Mathew, that Mathew "has an excellent reputation for honestly in the business community" If Mary's attorney objects to the introduced of evidence, it is most likely that

A) The objection will be overruled because character evidence is admissible in a civil case

B)The objection will be overruled because Mathew's character is a direct issue in this case

C)The objection will be sustained because the testimony is hearsay

D)The Objection ill be sustained because evidence of Mathew's character is not admissible