Mary wanted to buy a used car. She made an offer to purchase the car on condition that a licensed mechanic inspects it. The seller agreed, so Mary had the car inspected by Expert Inspections Ltd. The licensed mechanic employed by Expert was very busy the day that Mary brought the car in for the inspection and did not check all aspects of the car. The mechanic signed an opinion that said that the car needed a new water pump that would cost $200, including installation and that the oil and air filters should be changed for a price of $100. Relying on these opinions Mary removed from her offer the condition for a mechanical inspection and bought the car. Later, when Mary took the car for servicing, the water pump cost $500 to replace and the filters cost $100, but it was discovered that the transmission would need a complete overhaul at a cost of $1000. Which one of the following is correct about what Mary can do?

a.Mary cannot sue Expert Inspections Ltd. because their opinion cannot be a misrepresentation in this set of facts.

b.Mary can sue Expert Inspections Ltd. but only for the extra costs of the water pump repair but not for the costs to overhaul the transmission.

c.Mary can sue Expert Inspections Ltd. and the mechanic for misrepresentation.

d.Mary can sue the seller for breach of condition and the mechanic for negligent misstatement.

e.Mary has no right to sue anyone in this case.