Matthew owns and operates a house painting company in Columbia, Missouri. Wolf hired Matthew to paint his house black and gold in preparation for the upcoming Mizzou football season. Matthew did paint Wolf$$s house, but he painted it purple and white instead of back and gold because he is a fan of the Kansas State Wildcats. Amaris, Wolf$$s best friend, sued Matthew, alleging he breached the painting contract because Matthew did not paint Wolf$$s house black and gold as they had agreed upon. Does Amaris have standing as an appropriate plaintiff to file this lawsuit?

Group of answer choices

Amaris does not have standing because painting the house the wrong colors was not an injury in fact.

Amaris does have standing because Wolf suffered an injury in fact.

Amaris does not have standing because the injury suffered is not fairly traceable to Matthew.

Amaris does have standing because the injury she suffered can be alleviated by a favorable decision from the court in the lawsuit.

Amaris does not have standing because she did not suffer an injury in fact caused by Matthew.