Mayra, an attorney licensed in Indiana with a law office in Gary, Indiana, has a business office in Illinois. In her Illinois business, she imported maple syrup from Canada and sold it to distributors in California. Her importing work was unconnected with the legal work that she did in Indiana. Two years ago, she deliberately misrepresented the grade of shipment of syrup and thereby overcharged her U.S. customers. When they discovered the fraud, they confronted Mayra, who settled with them out of court for an undisclosed sum. The matter was reported in the trade press. One of her customers sent a copy of the article to the Indiana bar disciplinary authority. Is Mayra subject to discipline in Indiana based on these events? Group of answer choices A. Yes, because Mayra's conduct involved dishonesty. B. Yes, because the matter was not merely reported in the press; a customer made a complaint to the Indiana bar. C. No, because Mayra did not do anything wrong in Indiana. D. No, because Mayra's conduct had nothing to do with her work as a lawyer, and she has settled with her customers