mental defect. i\" b. As it pertains to consent, mental limitations are equivalent to incapacity. f" c The person giving consent to the act has to both consent to the act and has to understand the likely harm that the act would cause. f\" d. Just as the child in Gnrroit v. Bailey simply had to have known the person would hit the ground, but not that he would he hurt, the person giving consent (and thereby negating intent of the plaintiff) shrrply had to give consent to the act, and not necessarily the harm that would be caused by the act. 3' points Question 9 1. 1Which statement is false as it pertains to negligence cases? i" a. Mentally decient persons do not have the duty to use reasonable care. i" b. Certain subjective characteristics of the defendant may be factors in deteriru'ning duty and breach. ll\"c. Factual circumstances can define the paramaters of the duty to act with reasonable care. t\" d. Both ohvsical and mental disabilities are considered T.vhen the actor is a child