Mickey entered into a contract with Goofy for Goofy to supply apples for Mickey's apple juice business. Both parties are from California and the contract was signed in California. Goofy got confused and supplied oranges on the agreed date and time. This cause Mickey to lose approximately $$2\mathrm{.}5$ million. Mickey sued Goofy in Los Angeles Superior Court in the state of California. The law in California is clear but there are different laws in Oregon, Washington and Arizona. Which of the following is true:

The judge can follow Oregon law based on a appellate case even though it conflicts with California law.

The judge must follow California law that is based on a California Supreme court case which conflicts with a Arizona Supreme court case

The judge may follow any state law that the court deems is fair in their discretion.

The judge must follow a Washington Supreme court case which conflicts with California law.