Mitch, a fifteen year old neighbor, contracted with Barbara to mow Barbara's lawn for two years in return payment of $25 each week. The arrangements were made verbally. After three months, Barbara has decided that she wants to cancel the contract because she lost her job and can now mow the lawn herself. Barbara's best argument for canceling the contract is:

	A.	the contract isn't legally enforceable pursuant to promissory estoppel
	B.	the contract isn't binding on Barbara because she mistakenly believed she would continue to have a job
	C.	the contract isn't binding on Barbara because Mitch lacks legal capacity to enter into a contract
	D.	the contract isn't legally enforceable due to failing to comply with the writing requirement of the Staute of Frauds