Mitch was employed as a laborer by the City of Toronto, Ontario. On September 12, 2011, Mitch was sent to the Toronto City Park and instructed to plant a row of saplings along the property line between the City Park and the neighboring property, owned by Massey. While the city supplied the saplings, Mitch had to provide his own tools and materials. Mitch went to the City Park and began to dig holes for the saplings along what he believed was the city's side of the dividing line between the properties. He was relying on stakes that were erroneously placed by the City of Toronto on Massey's property. After he had dug several holes, Massey came out of her house and advised Mitch that he was digging on her property. She ordered him to leave. Mitch became enraged and swung his shovel at Massey narrowly missing her head. Frightened that Mitch would strike her, Massey jumped backwards. But she tripped and broke her ankle. She then got up and went inside. Hobbling, a few minutes later, Massey returned from her house holding her Beretta 92FS semiautomatic pistol. Pointing the gun at Mitch, who was still packing up his equipment, Massey shouted, "Get the fuc off my property now, asshole!" Mitch was pretty scared and immediately jumped in his truck and drove away. Identify and discuss all the intentional torts that Massey might reasonably assert against Mitch. Can Mitch bring any action against Massey? Yes, what action? And what elements does he need to prove? Note: Make sure that you apply the relevant and correct principle(s) of tort law in respect to each question above. Application means you have to identify the correct legal concept, define it, enumerate the elements, and then apply it to the fact scenario before drawing conclusion.