MKG is a medium sized accounting firm located in Little Rock, Arkansas.They provide two types of services, audit and tax.MKG has two types of costs - direct labor, and overhead, which includes everything other than direct labor.Direct labor is traced directly from time sheets to specific audit jobs and tax returns.Overhead costs consists of facility costs (rent on their office space, furnishings, utilities, insurance, etc.) and indirect labor (clerical workers and assistants who do not have direct contact with clients).Facilities costs make up approximately 70% of total overhead costs, with indirect labor making up the rest.

Considering the cost allocation during the current year, at the start of the current year, MKG had two audit jobs "in process", but no tax returns "in process". MKG accumulates costs in the jobs until the jobs are completed, at which time all revenue and costs are recognized.

Jobs "in process", as of January 1 (*):

Audit job #456Direct Labor$12,000 Overhead$8,000Revenue (*)$50,000

Audit job #459Direct Labor$4,000 Overhead$3,000Revenue (*)$10,000

(*) The costs are those incurred so far, i.e., those incurred in the prior year.The revenue is the total revenue for the job, which will be recorded as revenue in the current year.

There were no jobs or returns "in process" at the end of the current year.

Overhead costs at MKG are allocated first to the audit and tax departments based on the actual number of direct labor hours in each department during the year, using a pre-determined (normal) overhead rate.MKG does NOT pro-rate estimation errors.Within each department, allocations are all made using actual costing, and using a weighted average cost flow assumption.The audit department allocates overhead to audit jobs based on customer revenue, while the tax department allocates overhead to tax returns based on the number of tax returns completed.

MKG's firm-level budget for the current year called for $2,800,000 in overhead, but actual overhead was $12,000 higher than budgeted.

Audit Department: During the current year, the audit department budgeted for 20,000 hours at an average of $50 per hour in direct labor.The budget called for 625 jobs, with a total revenue of $2,750,000.The audit department actually had 22,000 direct labor hours, at a total cost of $1,100,000.During the year, the audit department completed 600 jobs (including jobs #456 and #459), with an actual total revenue of $2,475,000.

Tax Department: During the current year, the tax department budgeted for 50,000 hours at an average of $60 per hour in direct labor.The budget called for 900 returns, with a total revenue of $7,200,000.The tax department actually had 52,000 direct labor hours, at a total cost of $3,120,000.During the year, the tax department completed 1000 returns, with an actual total revenue of $7,800,000.

1. Tax return #1562 had actual direct labor of 120 hours, at an average rate of $55 per hour, and generated revenue of $6,000.How much total cost is included in cost of services for the year for tax return #1562?

2.Audit job #612 had actual direct labor of 100 hours, at a total direct labor cost of $8,000, and generated revenue of $15,000.How much total cost is included in cost of services for the year for audit job #612?

3.At the end of the year, MKG will adjust their cost of services for over or under applied overhead.What effect will this adjustment have on MKG's net income for the year?(e.g., increase by $10, decrease by $20, or no effect).

4.MKG allocates overhead to the two departments based on direct labor hours.Name one other possible alternative driver for the overhead.

why MKG might prefer to use your alternative rather than direct labor hours ?

why MKG might prefer to use direct labor hours rather than your alternative?

5. What are three factors that MKG would want to consider before deciding whether or not to increase the accuracy of their cost system (by, for example, finding a better driver)?